PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLT5.L vs. SGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLT5.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLT5.L achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's -1.83% return.


GLT5.L

1D
0.20%
1M
0.78%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.86%
1Y
2.92%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
0.95%
10Y*

SGLN.L

1D
2.90%
1M
-9.54%
YTD
-1.83%
6M
-1.90%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
26.65%
5Y*
18.64%
10Y*
13.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLT5.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GLT5.L
Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist
0.50%5.31%2.14%3.86%-5.44%-1.89%1.83%0.88%
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
-1.83%53.66%28.20%7.24%11.84%-2.82%19.93%17.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GLT5.L and SGLN.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2019

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLT5.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLT5.L
GLT5.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GLT5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLT5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SGLN.L
SGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLT5.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLT5.LSGLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.22

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.13

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.08

3.51

+0.57

GLT5.L vs. SGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLT5.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the SGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLT5.L and SGLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLT5.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLT5.L drawdown since its inception was -10.98%, smaller than the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -53.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLT5.L and SGLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLT5.LSGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.98%

-53.23%

+42.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.20%

-22.87%

+20.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.20%

-22.87%

+20.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.32%

-22.87%

+12.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-20.64%

+20.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.48%

-24.70%

+22.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

7.37%

-6.67%

Volatility

GLT5.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist (GLT5.L) is 1.82%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a volatility of 6.68%. This indicates that GLT5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLT5.LSGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.82%

6.68%

-4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

20.78%

-18.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99%

23.82%

-20.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.24%

21.84%

-18.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.81%

18.84%

-16.03%

GLT5.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLT5.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SGLN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLT5.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

GLT5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, while SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GLT5.L
Invesco UK Gilt 1-5 Year UCITS ETF Dist
4.13%4.12%4.43%3.76%1.01%0.19%0.33%0.44%
SGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLT5.L and SGLN.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLT5.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLT5.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SGLN.L.

GLT5.L is categorized as European Government Bonds, while SGLN.L is Gold. GLT5.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while SGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for GLT5.L and 0.12% for SGLN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLT5.L and SGLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer