GLRA.L vs. HPRD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GLRA.L (SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap) and HPRD.L (HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF) are both REIT funds tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, from State Street and HSBC respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLRA.L returned 1.35%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for HPRD.L. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GLRA.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for HPRD.L.

Performance

GLRA.L vs. HPRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap (GLRA.L) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLRA.L achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly higher than HPRD.L's 6.60% return.

GLRA.L

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -0.86%
• YTD: 6.97%
• 6M: 6.70%
• 1Y: 12.22%
• 3Y*: 8.90%
• 5Y*: 1.35%
• 10Y*: —

HPRD.L

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -1.76%
• YTD: 6.60%
• 6M: 7.06%
• 1Y: 11.93%
• 3Y*: 9.23%
• 5Y*: 1.18%
• 10Y*: 3.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLRA.L vs. HPRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GLRA.L SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap	6.97%	10.04%	-0.75%	11.39%	-25.32%	30.28%	-10.67%	-1.08%
HPRD.L HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF	6.60%	10.90%	-0.19%	10.88%	-24.76%	26.43%	-8.89%	-0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GLRA.L and HPRD.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2019	0.95

The correlation between GLRA.L and HPRD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

GLRA.L vs. HPRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GLRA.L	HPRD.L
Real Estate	99.9%	98.3%
Industrials	0.0%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	0.0%
Utilities	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	0.3%

Return for Risk

GLRA.L vs. HPRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLRA.L

GLRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
GLRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
GLRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
GLRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 25
GLRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
GLRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33

HPRD.L

HPRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
HPRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
HPRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
HPRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
HPRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
HPRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLRA.L vs. HPRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap (GLRA.L) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLRA.L	HPRD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	0.99	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	1.50	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.18	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	1.17	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.92	4.33	+0.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLRA.L vs. HPRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the HPRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLRA.L and HPRD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLRA.L	HPRD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	0.99	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	0.07	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.31	-0.23

Drawdowns

GLRA.L vs. HPRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLRA.L drawdown since its inception was -38.24%, smaller than the maximum HPRD.L drawdown of -41.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLRA.L and HPRD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLRA.L	HPRD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.24%	-41.81%	+3.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.41%	-10.12%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.24%	-18.25%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.18%	-33.48%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.58%	-3.76%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.09%	-9.43%	-5.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.48%	2.75%	-0.27%

Volatility

GLRA.L vs. HPRD.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap (GLRA.L) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF (HPRD.L) at 3.69%. This indicates that GLRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLRA.L	HPRD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	3.69%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	9.30%	+0.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.15%	11.99%	+1.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.97%	16.32%	+0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.33%	16.93%	+4.40%

GLRA.L vs. HPRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLRA.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HPRD.L's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLRA.L vs. HPRD.L - Dividend Comparison

GLRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HPRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLRA.L SPDR® Dow Jones Global Real Estate UCITS ETF USD Cap	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HPRD.L HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF	3.06%	3.17%	3.39%	3.35%	3.53%	2.30%	2.88%	2.96%	3.43%	2.89%	3.13%	2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLRA.L and HPRD.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, GLRA.L and HPRD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, GLRA.L or HPRD.L?

On fees, HPRD.L is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLRA.L or HPRD.L?

HPRD.L is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLRA.L.

What is the main difference between GLRA.L and HPRD.L?

Both ETFs track FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLRA.L and 0.24% for HPRD.L.