GLIV vs. MNRS
GLIV (Grayscale Livepeer Trust (LPT)) and MNRS (Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLIV is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Grayscale, while MNRS is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index. GLIV is actively managed, while MNRS is passively managed. Over the past year, GLIV returned -73.83% vs 78.52% for MNRS. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLIV vs. MNRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLIV achieves a -34.03% return, which is significantly lower than MNRS's 42.42% return.
GLIV
- 1D
- 1.29%
- 1M
- -19.90%
- YTD
- -34.03%
- 6M
- -34.31%
- 1Y
- -73.83%
- 3Y*
- -32.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNRS
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- -13.85%
- YTD
- 42.42%
- 6M
- 38.53%
- 1Y
- 78.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLIV vs. MNRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLIV Grayscale Livepeer Trust (LPT) | -34.03% | -77.86% |
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF | 42.42% | 14.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLIV and MNRS is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLIV vs. MNRS — Risk / Return Rank
GLIV
MNRS
GLIV vs. MNRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Livepeer Trust (LPT) (GLIV) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLIV | MNRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.21 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 1.39 | -2.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 2.70 | -3.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLIV vs. MNRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLIV drawdown since its inception was -97.65%, which is greater than MNRS's maximum drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIV and MNRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLIV | MNRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.65% | -56.70% | -40.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.40% | -56.70% | -27.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.47% | -21.50% | -75.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.81% | -23.31% | -48.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.92% | 29.22% | +31.70% |
Volatility
GLIV vs. MNRS - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale Livepeer Trust (LPT) (GLIV) has a higher volatility of 24.08% compared to Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) at 19.95%. This indicates that GLIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLIV | MNRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.08% | 19.95% | +4.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.59% | 52.48% | +19.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 124.52% | 71.17% | +53.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 174.97% | 70.59% | +104.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 174.97% | 70.59% | +104.38% |
Dividends
GLIV vs. MNRS - Dividend Comparison
GLIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLIV Grayscale Livepeer Trust (LPT) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF | 0.38% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLIV and MNRS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLIV has higher volatility (24.08%) compared to MNRS (19.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLIV dropped -97.65% vs MNRS's -56.70%.
On 1-year performance, MNRS leads with 78.52% vs -73.83% for GLIV. On volatility, MNRS has been the lower-risk option at 19.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MNRS has performed better with a 78.52% return vs -73.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MNRS has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for GLIV.
GLIV is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MNRS is Blockchain.
MNRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLIV and MNRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer