PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GLIN.AX vs. AUMF.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GLIN.AX vs. AUMF.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

GLIN.AX (iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF) and AUMF.AX (iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLIN.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) Index, while AUMF.AX is a Multi-factor fund tracking the MSCI Australia IMI Diversified Multiple-Factor (AUD) GROSS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GLIN.AX returned 12.07%/yr vs 11.71%/yr for AUMF.AX. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GLIN.AX vs. AUMF.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (GLIN.AX) and iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF (AUMF.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLIN.AX achieves a 12.44% return, which is significantly higher than AUMF.AX's -1.94% return.

GLIN.AX

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.78%
6M
12.69%
YTD
12.44%
1Y
17.78%
3Y*
12.07%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

AUMF.AX

1D
0.18%
1M
-1.89%
6M
-1.57%
YTD
-1.94%
1Y
3.42%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
7.36%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLIN.AX vs. AUMF.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
GLIN.AX
iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF		12.44%12.04%12.01%0.06%
AUMF.AX
iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF		-1.94%17.56%14.19%7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between GLIN.AX and AUMF.AX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF

iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF

Return for Risk

GLIN.AX vs. AUMF.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GLIN.AX
GLIN.AX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
GLIN.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLIN.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
AUMF.AX
AUMF.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
AUMF.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUMF.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUMF.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
AUMF.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUMF.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLIN.AX vs. AUMF.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (GLIN.AX) and iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF (AUMF.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

GLIN.AXAUMF.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.72
0.22

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.41
0.40

+2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.05

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

0.28

+2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.92

0.66

+9.27

GLIN.AX vs. AUMF.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLIN.AX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the AUMF.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLIN.AX and AUMF.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLIN.AX vs. AUMF.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLIN.AX drawdown since its inception was -12.66%, smaller than the maximum AUMF.AX drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLIN.AX and AUMF.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GLIN.AXAUMF.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.66%

-36.93%

+24.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.76%

-10.47%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.66%

-10.47%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-16.05%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-5.01%

+3.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-3.86%

+1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

4.48%

-2.61%

Volatility

GLIN.AX vs. AUMF.AX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF (GLIN.AX) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF (AUMF.AX) at 2.80%. This indicates that GLIN.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUMF.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GLIN.AXAUMF.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

2.80%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.80%

11.21%

-2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.72%

13.35%

-2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.33%

13.08%

-0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.33%

14.11%

-1.78%

Dividends

GLIN.AX vs. AUMF.AX - Dividend Comparison

GLIN.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, more than AUMF.AX's 1.44% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AUMF.AX
iShares Edge MSCI Australia Multifactor ETF		1.44%2.80%3.34%4.69%6.09%2.52%2.71%4.45%8.24%
GLIN.AX
iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) ETF		5.93%2.94%2.60%1.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

GLIN.AX and AUMF.AX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLIN.AX is categorized as Global Equities, while AUMF.AX is Multi-factor. GLIN.AX tracks iShares Core FTSE Global Infrastructure (AUD Hedged) Index, while AUMF.AX tracks MSCI Australia IMI Diversified Multiple-Factor (AUD) GROSS Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLIN.AX and AUMF.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer