PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDY vs. HYTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDY vs. HYTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) and FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDY achieves a -2.30% return, which is significantly lower than HYTI's 1.84% return.


GLDY

1D
-0.58%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
-2.30%
6M
-0.58%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYTI

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.84%
6M
2.45%
1Y
7.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDY vs. HYTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GLDY and HYTI is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDY vs. HYTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDY
GLDY Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GLDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDY Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDY Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

HYTI
HYTI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HYTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
HYTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDY vs. HYTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) and FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDYHYTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.37

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

3.06

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.47

12.98

-10.50

GLDY vs. HYTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDY Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the HYTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDY and HYTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDYHYTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

1.90

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

1.32

-0.76

Drawdowns

GLDY vs. HYTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDY drawdown since its inception was -13.43%, which is greater than HYTI's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDY and HYTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDYHYTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.43%

-4.47%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

-2.38%

-11.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.12%

-0.05%

-13.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-0.46%

-3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.61%

0.56%

+5.05%

Volatility

GLDY vs. HYTI - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) at 1.14%. This indicates that GLDY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDYHYTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

1.14%

+3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.27%

3.02%

+15.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.87%

3.83%

+16.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

5.22%

+14.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.58%

5.22%

+14.36%

GLDY vs. HYTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than HYTI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDY vs. HYTI - Dividend Comparison

GLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.42%, more than HYTI's 10.40% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GLDY and HYTI have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDY has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to HYTI (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDY dropped -13.43% vs HYTI's -4.47%.

On 1-year performance, GLDY leads with 13.84% vs 7.25% for HYTI. On fees, HYTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, HYTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GLDY has performed better with a 13.84% return vs 7.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GLDY.

GLDY has the higher dividend yield at 46.42%, compared with 10.40% for HYTI.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GLDY and 0.65% for HYTI.

HYTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDY and HYTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer