PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDX.TO vs. COPP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GLDX.TO vs. COPP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Gold Producers Index ETF (GLDX.TO) and Global X Copper Producers Index ETF (COPP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GLDX.TO vs. COPP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GLDX.TO
Global X Gold Producers Index ETF
8.02%178.05%-11.40%
COPP.TO
Global X Copper Producers Index ETF
2.05%66.80%-14.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDX.TO achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly higher than COPP.TO's 2.05% return.


GLDX.TO

1D
7.06%
1M
-19.13%
YTD
8.02%
6M
24.46%
1Y
114.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COPP.TO

1D
8.08%
1M
-18.57%
YTD
2.05%
6M
21.76%
1Y
74.15%
3Y*
24.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GLDX.TO vs. COPP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

GLDX.TO vs. COPP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDX.TO
GLDX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GLDX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

COPP.TO
COPP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
COPP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
COPP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDX.TO vs. COPP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Gold Producers Index ETF (GLDX.TO) and Global X Copper Producers Index ETF (COPP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDX.TOCOPP.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.44

1.75

+0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.59

2.22

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.30

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

2.48

+1.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.73

9.39

+4.34

GLDX.TO vs. COPP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the COPP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDX.TO and COPP.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDX.TOCOPP.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.75

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.37

0.55

+1.82

Correlation

The correlation between GLDX.TO and COPP.TO is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GLDX.TO vs. COPP.TO - Dividend Comparison

GLDX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than COPP.TO's 0.17% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
GLDX.TO
Global X Gold Producers Index ETF
0.90%0.97%0.08%0.00%0.00%
COPP.TO
Global X Copper Producers Index ETF
0.17%0.18%0.19%0.73%1.20%

Drawdowns

GLDX.TO vs. COPP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDX.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.14%, smaller than the maximum COPP.TO drawdown of -40.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDX.TO and COPP.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDX.TOCOPP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.14%

-40.80%

+10.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.14%

-28.09%

-2.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.13%

-18.69%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-14.24%

+9.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.42%

7.42%

+1.00%

Volatility

GLDX.TO vs. COPP.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Gold Producers Index ETF (GLDX.TO) and Global X Copper Producers Index ETF (COPP.TO) have volatilities of 18.08% and 17.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GLDX.TOCOPP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.08%

17.91%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.21%

31.73%

+6.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.99%

42.64%

+4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.32%

37.95%

+5.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.32%

37.95%

+5.37%