PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
COPP.TO vs. ZMT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

COPP.TO vs. ZMT.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Copper Producers Index ETF (COPP.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged) (ZMT.TO).

COPP.TO and ZMT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COPP.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive North American Listed Copper Producers Index. It was launched on May 16, 2022. ZMT.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive Equal Weight Global Base Metals Index Canadian Dollar Hedged. It was launched on Oct 20, 2009. Both COPP.TO and ZMT.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

COPP.TO vs. ZMT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Copper Producers Index ETF (COPP.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged) (ZMT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

COPP.TO vs. ZMT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
COPP.TO
Global X Copper Producers Index ETF		2.05%66.80%15.35%11.74%-4.85%
ZMT.TO
BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged)		9.48%63.17%15.30%14.54%-8.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPP.TO achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than ZMT.TO's 9.48% return.

COPP.TO

1D
8.08%
1M
-18.57%
YTD
2.05%
6M
21.76%
1Y
74.15%
3Y*
24.82%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

ZMT.TO

1D
7.64%
1M
-13.72%
YTD
9.48%
6M
27.57%
1Y
85.63%
3Y*
28.28%
5Y*
16.96%
10Y*
15.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Copper Producers Index ETF

BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged)

Often compared with COPP.TO:
COPP.TO vs. SETMCOPP.TO vs. COPPCOPP.TO vs. CPCC.TOCOPP.TO vs. METLCOPP.TO vs. ZCN.TOCOPP.TO vs. EBNK.TOCOPP.TO vs. COPX
Often compared with ZMT.TO:
ZMT.TO vs. XBM.TOZMT.TO vs. COPPZMT.TO vs. COPXZMT.TO vs. ZGD.TOZMT.TO vs. REMXZMT.TO vs. SETMZMT.TO vs. SPY

COPP.TO vs. ZMT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPP.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMT.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.

COPP.TO
Global X Copper Producers Index ETF
ZMT.TO
BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged)

Return for Risk

COPP.TO vs. ZMT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
COPP.TO
COPP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
COPP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
COPP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
ZMT.TO
ZMT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
ZMT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZMT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZMT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ZMT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZMT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPP.TO vs. ZMT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Producers Index ETF (COPP.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged) (ZMT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

COPP.TOZMT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

2.12

-0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

2.66

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.38

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

3.58

-1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.39

11.07

-1.68

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COPP.TO vs. ZMT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the ZMT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPP.TO and ZMT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

COPP.TOZMT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.12

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.51

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.47

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.00

+0.55

Correlation

The correlation between COPP.TO and ZMT.TO is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

COPP.TO vs. ZMT.TO - Dividend Comparison

COPP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than ZMT.TO's 0.19% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COPP.TO
Global X Copper Producers Index ETF		0.17%0.18%0.19%0.73%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZMT.TO
BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged)		0.19%0.21%0.34%0.87%1.46%2.82%1.03%2.34%3.95%1.29%1.24%1.10%

Drawdowns

COPP.TO vs. ZMT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPP.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.80%, smaller than the maximum ZMT.TO drawdown of -80.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPP.TO and ZMT.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

COPP.TOZMT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.80%

-80.73%

+39.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.09%

-23.81%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-41.01%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-67.51%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.69%

-14.38%

-4.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.24%

-43.56%

+29.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.42%

7.70%

-0.28%

Volatility

COPP.TO vs. ZMT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Copper Producers Index ETF (COPP.TO) and BMO S&P/TSX Equal Weight Global Base Metals (CAD Hedged) (ZMT.TO) have volatilities of 17.91% and 17.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

COPP.TOZMT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.91%

17.21%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.73%

32.63%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.64%

40.64%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.95%

33.30%

+4.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.95%

33.22%

+4.73%