PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDW.L vs. WDEF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDW.L vs. WDEF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (GLDW.L) and WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS ETF - EUR Acc EUR (WDEF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GLDW.L is traded in GBp, while WDEF.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the WDEF.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDW.L achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly higher than WDEF.L's -0.02% return.


GLDW.L

1D
0.63%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
3.96%
6M
5.38%
1Y
33.68%
3Y*
28.15%
5Y*
19.87%
10Y*

WDEF.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.77%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
2.85%
1Y
-2.04%
3Y*
9.31%
5Y*
5.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDW.L vs. WDEF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GLDW.L
WisdomTree Core Physical Gold
3.96%53.57%28.18%7.26%11.82%9.07%
WDEF.L
WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS ETF - EUR Acc EUR
1.27%32.72%-6.71%18.06%-15.48%17.58%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDW.L and WDEF.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2021

-0.01

The correlation between GLDW.L and WDEF.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (5 years) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDW.L vs. WDEF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDW.L
GLDW.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GLDW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

WDEF.L
WDEF.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
WDEF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDEF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDEF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
WDEF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDEF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDW.L vs. WDEF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (GLDW.L) and WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS ETF - EUR Acc EUR (WDEF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDW.LWDEF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.09

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

-0.08

+1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.05

-0.22

+5.27

GLDW.L vs. WDEF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDW.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the WDEF.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDW.L and WDEF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDW.LWDEF.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

-0.03

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

0.16

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.30

0.33

+0.97

Drawdowns

GLDW.L vs. WDEF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDW.L drawdown since its inception was -17.86%, smaller than the maximum WDEF.L drawdown of -27.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW.L and WDEF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDW.LWDEF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.86%

-27.89%

+10.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.86%

-26.45%

+8.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.86%

-26.45%

+8.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.86%

-27.89%

+10.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.93%

-15.86%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-7.82%

+4.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.65%

9.25%

-2.60%

Volatility

GLDW.L vs. WDEF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (GLDW.L) is 5.09%, while WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS ETF - EUR Acc EUR (WDEF.L) has a volatility of 10.30%. This indicates that GLDW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WDEF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDW.LWDEF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

10.30%

-5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.81%

64.56%

-44.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.95%

73.80%

-50.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.09%

42.77%

-26.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

41.41%

-25.47%

GLDW.L vs. WDEF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDW.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than WDEF.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDW.L vs. WDEF.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GLDW.L nor WDEF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDW.L and WDEF.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLDW.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLDW.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for WDEF.L.

GLDW.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while WDEF.L is Aerospace & Defense. GLDW.L tracks Gold, while WDEF.L tracks WisdomTree Europe Defence UCITS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GLDW.L and 0.40% for WDEF.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDW.L and WDEF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer