GLDW.L vs. COPA.L
GLDW.L (WisdomTree Core Physical Gold) and COPA.L (WisdomTree Copper) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDW.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while COPA.L is a Metals fund tracking the Bloomberg Copper Subindex. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLDW.L returned 19.87%/yr vs 8.15%/yr for COPA.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDW.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COPA.L.
Performance
GLDW.L vs. COPA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLDW.L is traded in GBp, while COPA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COPA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDW.L achieves a 3.96% return, which is significantly lower than COPA.L's 14.05% return.
GLDW.L
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- 1Y
- 33.68%
- 3Y*
- 28.15%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- —
COPA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 9.70%
- YTD
- 14.05%
- 6M
- 19.87%
- 1Y
- 31.14%
- 3Y*
- 15.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
GLDW.L vs. COPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDW.L WisdomTree Core Physical Gold | 3.96% | 53.57% | 28.18% | 7.26% | 11.82% | 9.07% |
COPA.L WisdomTree Copper | 14.40% | 26.65% | 6.64% | -2.47% | -3.31% | 8.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDW.L and COPA.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2021 | 0.22 |
The correlation between GLDW.L and COPA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDW.L vs. COPA.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLDW.L
COPA.L
GLDW.L vs. COPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (GLDW.L) and WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDW.L | COPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.24 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 1.30 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | 2.87 | +2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDW.L | COPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 0.96 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 0.33 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.30 | 0.14 | +1.16 |
Drawdowns
GLDW.L vs. COPA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDW.L drawdown since its inception was -17.86%, smaller than the maximum COPA.L drawdown of -58.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDW.L and COPA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDW.L | COPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.86% | -58.32% | +40.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.86% | -23.82% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.86% | -23.82% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.86% | -26.80% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.93% | -2.27% | -13.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -25.46% | +21.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.65% | 10.84% | -4.19% |
Volatility
GLDW.L vs. COPA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Core Physical Gold (GLDW.L) is 5.09%, while WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L) has a volatility of 8.17%. This indicates that GLDW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDW.L | COPA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.09% | 8.17% | -3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.81% | 17.79% | +2.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.95% | 32.35% | -9.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.09% | 24.65% | -8.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 22.69% | -6.75% |
GLDW.L vs. COPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDW.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than COPA.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDW.L vs. COPA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDW.L nor COPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDW.L and COPA.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLDW.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDW.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COPA.L.
GLDW.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while COPA.L is Metals. GLDW.L tracks Gold, while COPA.L tracks Bloomberg Copper Subindex. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GLDW.L and 0.49% for COPA.L.
Find the right allocation for GLDW.L and COPA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer