GLDU.TO vs. CBIL.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF (GLDU.TO) and Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO).
GLDU.TO and CBIL.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLDU.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Gold Front Month MD Rolling Futures Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 2008. CBIL.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Apr 12, 2023.
Performance
GLDU.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GLDU.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDU.TO BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF | 9.50% | 128.66% | 42.19% | -3.12% |
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 0.30% | 2.68% | 4.47% | 3.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDU.TO achieves a 9.50% return, which is significantly higher than CBIL.TO's 0.30% return.
GLDU.TO
- 1D
- 7.51%
- 1M
- -22.65%
- YTD
- 9.50%
- 6M
- 30.74%
- 1Y
- 82.43%
- 3Y*
- 52.61%
- 5Y*
- 31.17%
- 10Y*
- 17.13%
CBIL.TO
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 2.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GLDU.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDU.TO has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CBIL.TO's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GLDU.TO vs. CBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GLDU.TO
CBIL.TO
GLDU.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF (GLDU.TO) and Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDU.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.50 | 8.16 | -6.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 13.19 | -11.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 5.24 | -3.96 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 15.01 | -12.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.72 | 204.88 | -197.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDU.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 8.16 | -6.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 11.25 | -11.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDU.TO and CBIL.TO is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GLDU.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison
GLDU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBIL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDU.TO BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 2.27% | 2.59% | 4.38% | 3.39% |
Drawdowns
GLDU.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDU.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.99%, which is greater than CBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDU.TO and CBIL.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDU.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.99% | -0.15% | -77.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.13% | -0.15% | -37.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.76% | -0.15% | -28.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.03% | 0.00% | -49.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.33% | 0.01% | +11.32% |
Volatility
GLDU.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro Gold Bullion 2x Daily Bull ETF (GLDU.TO) has a higher volatility of 21.95% compared to Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO) at 0.16%. This indicates that GLDU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GLDU.TO | CBIL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.95% | 0.16% | +21.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.49% | 0.23% | +48.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.12% | 0.28% | +54.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.85% | 0.33% | +35.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.39% | 0.33% | +32.06% |