GLDI vs. SMHB
GLDI (UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033) and SMHB (ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDI is a Gold fund tracking the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index, while SMHB is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Small Cap High Dividend Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLDI returned 10.96%/yr vs -6.82%/yr for SMHB. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for SMHB.
Performance
GLDI vs. SMHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDI achieves a -4.45% return, which is significantly lower than SMHB's 7.31% return.
GLDI
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- -4.45%
- 6M
- -5.42%
- 1Y
- 11.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.47%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
SMHB
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 5.50%
- 3Y*
- 9.13%
- 5Y*
- -6.82%
- 10Y*
- —
GLDI vs. SMHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDI UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 | -4.45% | 34.25% | 17.76% | 8.93% | -1.11% | -3.42% | 23.50% | 14.40% | 5.62% |
SMHB ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B | 7.31% | -7.75% | -15.85% | 35.96% | -36.03% | 68.86% | -43.21% | 13.05% | -24.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDI and SMHB is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDI vs. SMHB — Risk / Return Rank
GLDI
SMHB
GLDI vs. SMHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI) and ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDI | SMHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.06 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 0.22 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.73 | 0.53 | +2.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDI vs. SMHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDI drawdown since its inception was -32.26%, smaller than the maximum SMHB drawdown of -90.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDI and SMHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDI | SMHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.26% | -90.30% | +58.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.14% | -25.16% | +11.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.14% | -45.05% | +30.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.14% | -58.11% | +43.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.28% | -40.93% | +27.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.99% | -37.21% | +23.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | 10.47% | -6.17% |
Volatility
GLDI vs. SMHB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 (GLDI) is 7.18%, while ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB) has a volatility of 8.17%. This indicates that GLDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDI | SMHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | 8.17% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.58% | 24.75% | -10.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.99% | 38.33% | -22.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.58% | 48.92% | -37.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.52% | 66.13% | -54.61% |
GLDI vs. SMHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SMHB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDI vs. SMHB - Dividend Comparison
GLDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.67%, more than SMHB's 21.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDI UBS AG ETRACS Gold Shares Covered Call ETNs due February 2, 2033 | 26.67% | 16.15% | 10.45% | 10.02% | 13.73% | 10.65% | 14.25% | 7.25% | 5.33% | 7.77% | 17.26% | 10.07% |
SMHB ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B | 21.04% | 22.22% | 21.95% | 15.27% | 24.18% | 12.22% | 16.86% | 19.97% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDI and SMHB have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMHB has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to GLDI (7.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDI dropped -32.26% vs SMHB's -90.30%.
On 5-year performance, GLDI leads with 10.96% vs -6.82% for SMHB. On fees, GLDI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, GLDI has been the lower-risk option at 7.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLDI has performed better with a 10.96% return vs -6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLDI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SMHB.
GLDI has the higher dividend yield at 26.67%, compared with 21.04% for SMHB.
GLDI is categorized as Gold, while SMHB is Leveraged Equities. GLDI tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index, while SMHB tracks Solactive US Small Cap High Dividend Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GLDI and 0.85% for SMHB.
GLDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLDI and SMHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer