GLDI vs. MAIN
GLDI (Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN) is Precious Metals fund tracking the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Gold FLOWS 103 Index, while MAIN (Main Street Capital Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GLDI returned 8.20%/yr vs 13.19%/yr for MAIN. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLDI vs. MAIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDI achieves a -2.64% return, which is significantly higher than MAIN's -10.97% return. Over the past 10 years, GLDI has underperformed MAIN with an annualized return of 8.20%, while MAIN has yielded a comparatively higher 13.19% annualized return.
GLDI
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -6.86%
- YTD
- -2.64%
- 6M
- -2.08%
- 1Y
- 13.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.20%
MAIN
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- -10.97%
- 6M
- -12.92%
- 1Y
- -3.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.19%
GLDI vs. MAIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDI Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN | -2.64% | 34.25% | 17.76% | 8.93% | -1.11% | -3.42% | 23.50% | 14.40% | -0.54% | 8.94% |
MAIN Main Street Capital Corporation | -10.97% | 10.74% | 47.30% | 28.22% | -11.37% | 48.31% | -19.54% | 36.88% | -8.27% | 16.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDI and MAIN is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2013 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDI vs. MAIN — Risk / Return Rank
GLDI
MAIN
GLDI vs. MAIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI) and Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDI | MAIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.99 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | -0.18 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.77 | -0.35 | +4.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDI vs. MAIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDI drawdown since its inception was -32.26%, smaller than the maximum MAIN drawdown of -64.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDI and MAIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDI | MAIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.26% | -64.53% | +32.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.14% | -22.43% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.14% | -22.43% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.14% | -27.06% | +12.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.94% | -64.53% | +49.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.63% | -18.28% | +6.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.99% | -7.31% | -6.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 11.18% | -7.24% |
Volatility
GLDI vs. MAIN - Volatility Comparison
Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to Main Street Capital Corporation (MAIN) at 5.82%. This indicates that GLDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDI | MAIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.70% | 5.82% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.24% | 20.12% | -5.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.75% | 24.84% | -9.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.61% | 21.57% | -9.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.50% | 27.30% | -15.80% |
Dividends
GLDI vs. MAIN - Dividend Comparison
GLDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.45%, more than MAIN's 8.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDI Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN | 23.45% | 16.15% | 10.45% | 10.02% | 13.73% | 10.65% | 14.25% | 7.25% | 5.33% | 7.77% | 17.26% | 10.07% |
MAIN Main Street Capital Corporation | 8.25% | 7.00% | 7.02% | 8.55% | 7.97% | 5.74% | 6.99% | 6.76% | 8.43% | 7.49% | 7.42% | 9.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDI and MAIN have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDI has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to MAIN (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLDI dropped -32.26% vs MAIN's -64.53%.
GLDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLDI and MAIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer