PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDE.L vs. GOOI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GLDE.L vs. GOOI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP (GOOI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GLDE.L vs. GOOI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GLDE.L
IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP
2.76%42.81%2.22%
GOOI.L
IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP
-7.90%34.81%25.44%
Different Trading Currencies

GLDE.L is traded in GBp, while GOOI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GOOI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDE.L achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than GOOI.L's -7.90% return.


GLDE.L

1D
0.40%
1M
-10.21%
YTD
2.76%
6M
12.31%
1Y
26.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOI.L

1D
0.62%
1M
-4.47%
YTD
-7.90%
6M
9.13%
1Y
50.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GLDE.L vs. GOOI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDE.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOI.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GLDE.L vs. GOOI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDE.L
GLDE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
GLDE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOI.L
GOOI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GOOI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDE.L vs. GOOI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP (GOOI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDE.LGOOI.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

1.92

-0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.52

2.68

-1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

3.24

-1.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.35

10.71

-4.37

GLDE.L vs. GOOI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the GOOI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDE.L and GOOI.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDE.LGOOI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.92

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.62

1.30

+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between GLDE.L and GOOI.L is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

GLDE.L vs. GOOI.L - Dividend Comparison

GLDE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than GOOI.L's 15.06% yield.


TTM20252024
GLDE.L
IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP
4.70%4.82%0.38%
GOOI.L
IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP
15.06%11.19%2.00%

Drawdowns

GLDE.L vs. GOOI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDE.L drawdown since its inception was -16.63%, smaller than the maximum GOOI.L drawdown of -28.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDE.L and GOOI.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDE.LGOOI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.63%

-26.69%

+10.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.63%

-18.33%

+1.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.21%

-15.79%

+5.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.34%

-6.57%

+4.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

5.14%

-0.93%

Volatility

GLDE.L vs. GOOI.L - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L) has a higher volatility of 10.57% compared to IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP (GOOI.L) at 6.52%. This indicates that GLDE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GLDE.LGOOI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.57%

6.52%

+4.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.94%

16.32%

+2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.01%

26.33%

-4.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.76%

26.06%

-7.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.76%

26.06%

-7.30%