GLDE.L vs. 3PLT.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L).

GLDE.L and 3PLT.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLDE.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jul 18, 2024. 3PLT.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x PLTR Index. It was launched on Jun 14, 2021.

Performance

GLDE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GLDE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GLDE.L IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP	2.76%	42.81%	7.05%
3PLT.L Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities	-58.34%	154.21%	1,040.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDE.L achieves a 2.76% return, which is significantly higher than 3PLT.L's -58.34% return.

GLDE.L

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -10.21%
• YTD: 2.76%
• 6M: 12.31%
• 1Y: 26.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

3PLT.L

• 1D: 8.56%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: -58.34%
• 6M: -69.79%
• 1Y: 52.52%
• 3Y*: 337.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDE.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than 3PLT.L's 0.75% expense ratio.

3PLT.L

Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities

GLDE.L

IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP

Return for Risk

GLDE.L vs. 3PLT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDE.L

GLDE.L Risk / Return Rank: 60
GLDE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
GLDE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
GLDE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GLDE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
GLDE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 59

3PLT.L

3PLT.L Risk / Return Rank: 34
3PLT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
3PLT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
3PLT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 50
3PLT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
3PLT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLDE.L	3PLT.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	0.32	+0.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	1.62	-0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.20	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.61	0.52	+1.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.35	1.04	+5.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLDE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLDE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the 3PLT.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLDE.L and 3PLT.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLDE.L	3PLT.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	0.32	+0.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.62	-0.14	+1.76

Correlation

The correlation between GLDE.L and 3PLT.L is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

GLDE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Dividend Comparison

GLDE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, while 3PLT.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
GLDE.L IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP	4.70%	4.82%	0.38%
3PLT.L Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GLDE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDE.L drawdown since its inception was -16.63%, smaller than the maximum 3PLT.L drawdown of -99.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDE.L and 3PLT.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLDE.L	3PLT.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.63%	-99.89%	+83.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.63%	-83.56%	+66.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.21%	-83.63%	+73.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.34%	-84.57%	+82.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.21%	41.68%	-37.47%

Volatility

GLDE.L vs. 3PLT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares Gold + Yield ETP GBP (GLDE.L) is 10.57%, while Leverage Shares 3x Palantir ETP Securities (3PLT.L) has a volatility of 33.47%. This indicates that GLDE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3PLT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLDE.L	3PLT.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.57%	33.47%	-22.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.94%	108.95%	-90.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.01%	161.08%	-139.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.76%	194.33%	-175.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.76%	194.33%	-175.57%