GLDD.TO vs. HSAV.TO
GLDD.TO (BetaPro Gold Bullion -2x Daily Bear ETF) and HSAV.TO (Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDD.TO is a Inverse Commodities fund actively managed by Global X, while HSAV.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLDD.TO returned -28.84%/yr vs 3.18%/yr for HSAV.TO. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLDD.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDD.TO achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than HSAV.TO's 0.97% return.
GLDD.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 27.00%
- YTD
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- -40.89%
- 3Y*
- -39.58%
- 5Y*
- -28.84%
- 10Y*
- -21.65%
HSAV.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- 1Y
- 2.42%
- 3Y*
- 3.52%
- 5Y*
- 3.18%
- 10Y*
- —
GLDD.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDD.TO BetaPro Gold Bullion -2x Daily Bear ETF | 1.97% | -64.15% | -33.44% | -15.90% | -4.30% | 3.46% | -37.54% |
HSAV.TO Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF | 0.97% | 2.58% | 4.24% | 5.04% | 2.79% | 0.66% | 0.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDD.TO and HSAV.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2020 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDD.TO vs. HSAV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
GLDD.TO
HSAV.TO
GLDD.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro Gold Bullion -2x Daily Bear ETF (GLDD.TO) and Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDD.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.32 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 4.10 | -4.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 10.77 | -11.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDD.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDD.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.33%, which is greater than HSAV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDD.TO and HSAV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDD.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.33% | -2.18% | -97.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.45% | -0.59% | -64.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.50% | -1.06% | -87.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.20% | -2.18% | -88.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.88% | -0.24% | -98.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.80% | -0.19% | -82.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.02% | 0.22% | +43.80% |
Volatility
GLDD.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Volatility Comparison
BetaPro Gold Bullion -2x Daily Bear ETF (GLDD.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.89% compared to Global X Cash Maximizer Corporate Class ETF (HSAV.TO) at 0.26%. This indicates that GLDD.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSAV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDD.TO | HSAV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.89% | 0.26% | +16.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.86% | 1.02% | +44.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.22% | 1.39% | +52.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.71% | 1.77% | +34.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.66% | 1.57% | +48.09% |
Dividends
GLDD.TO vs. HSAV.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDD.TO nor HSAV.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDD.TO and HSAV.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDD.TO is categorized as Inverse Commodities, while HSAV.TO is Money Market.
Find the right allocation for GLDD.TO and HSAV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer