PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLDB vs. RFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLDB vs. RFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF (GLDB) and Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLDB achieves a -7.90% return, which is significantly lower than RFIX's 7.97% return.


GLDB

1D
-2.17%
1M
-7.55%
YTD
-7.90%
6M
-6.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RFIX

1D
0.99%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
7.97%
6M
-2.48%
1Y
-14.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLDB vs. RFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GLDB
Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF
-7.90%-3.51%
RFIX
Simplify Bond Bull ETF
7.97%-14.79%

Correlation

The correlation between GLDB and RFIX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLDB vs. RFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDB

RFIX
RFIX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
RFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
RFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLDB vs. RFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF (GLDB) and Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GLDB vs. RFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDBRFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

-0.76

+0.31

Drawdowns

GLDB vs. RFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLDB drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, smaller than the maximum RFIX drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDB and RFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDBRFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.36%

-38.79%

+11.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.71%

-32.25%

+5.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.44%

-24.11%

+10.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.70%

Volatility

GLDB vs. RFIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDBRFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.96%

29.75%

+10.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.96%

30.90%

+9.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.96%

30.90%

+9.06%

GLDB vs. RFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLDB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than RFIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLDB vs. RFIX - Dividend Comparison

GLDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than RFIX's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM2025
GLDB
Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF
0.21%0.19%
RFIX
Simplify Bond Bull ETF
4.63%5.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLDB and RFIX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RFIX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RFIX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for GLDB.

RFIX has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 0.21% for GLDB.

They also come from different issuers: Strategy Shares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for GLDB and 0.50% for RFIX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLDB and RFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer