GLDB vs. DUKZ
GLDB (Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF) and DUKZ (Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. GLDB is passively managed, while DUKZ is actively managed. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GLDB charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for DUKZ.
Performance
GLDB vs. DUKZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDB achieves a -19.84% return, which is significantly lower than DUKZ's 1.38% return.
GLDB
- 1D
- -2.39%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- 6M
- -24.53%
- YTD
- -19.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
DUKZ
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 4.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $214.45K | $470.33K | $592.18K | |
| $494.06K | $365.51K | $391.41K |
GLDB vs. DUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLDB Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF | -19.84% | -3.56% |
DUKZ Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF | 1.38% | -0.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDB and DUKZ is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDB vs. DUKZ — Risk / Return Rank
GLDB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DUKZ
GLDB vs. DUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF (GLDB) and Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF (DUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLDB | DUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.72 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLDB vs. DUKZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDB drawdown since its inception was -38.30%, which is greater than DUKZ's maximum drawdown of -4.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDB and DUKZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDB | DUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.30% | -4.70% | -33.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.21% | -1.75% | -34.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.73% | -1.12% | -16.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.01% | — |
Volatility
GLDB vs. DUKZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDB | DUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.04% | 4.62% | +34.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.04% | 4.38% | +34.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.04% | 4.38% | +34.66% |
GLDB vs. DUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than DUKZ's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLDB vs. DUKZ - Dividend Comparison
GLDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than DUKZ's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DUKZ Ocean Park Diversified Income ETF | 3.91% | 4.05% | 2.44% |
GLDB Strategy Shares Gold-Hedged Bond ETF | 0.24% | 0.19% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDB and DUKZ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLDB is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDB is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for DUKZ.
DUKZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.24% for GLDB.
They also come from different issuers: Strategy Shares and Ocean Park. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for GLDB and 1.03% for DUKZ.
Find the right allocation for GLDB and DUKZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer