GLDA.L vs. 500U.L
GLDA.L (Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C)) and 500U.L (Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - GLDA.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while 500U.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLDA.L returned 19.92%/yr vs 15.05%/yr for 500U.L. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLDA.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for 500U.L.
Performance
GLDA.L vs. 500U.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLDA.L is traded in GBp, while 500U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 500U.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLDA.L achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than 500U.L's 10.84% return.
GLDA.L
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- -2.91%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- 1Y
- 33.20%
- 3Y*
- 27.70%
- 5Y*
- 19.92%
- 10Y*
- —
500U.L
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 6M
- 10.80%
- 1Y
- 29.37%
- 3Y*
- 19.38%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 16.58%
GLDA.L vs. 500U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDA.L Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) | 3.18% | 53.56% | 28.19% | 7.26% | 12.68% | -3.12% | -2.69% |
500U.L Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.84% | 9.90% | 26.63% | 20.51% | -9.65% | 31.37% | 14.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLDA.L and 500U.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020 | 0.00 |
The correlation between GLDA.L and 500U.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (5 years) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLDA.L vs. 500U.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLDA.L
500U.L
GLDA.L vs. 500U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLDA.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.45 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 4.06 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.02 | 13.65 | -8.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLDA.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 2.47 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.40 | 1.00 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 1.33 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
GLDA.L vs. 500U.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLDA.L drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum 500U.L drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLDA.L and 500U.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLDA.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.57% | -26.14% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.90% | -7.19% | -10.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.90% | -20.95% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.90% | -20.95% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.61% | -0.22% | -16.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -3.62% | -1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 2.15% | +4.44% |
Volatility
GLDA.L vs. 500U.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Physical Gold ETC (C) (GLDA.L) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) at 3.58%. This indicates that GLDA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 500U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLDA.L | 500U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.18% | 3.58% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.40% | 8.66% | +11.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.46% | 11.91% | +11.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 15.26% | +2.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 18.56% | -0.54% |
GLDA.L vs. 500U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLDA.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than 500U.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLDA.L vs. 500U.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GLDA.L nor 500U.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GLDA.L and 500U.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLDA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLDA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 500U.L.
GLDA.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while 500U.L is S&P 500. GLDA.L tracks Gold, while 500U.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for GLDA.L and 0.15% for 500U.L.
Find the right allocation for GLDA.L and 500U.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer