PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. VTIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. VTIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than VTIP's 1.76% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has outperformed VTIP with an annualized return of 12.56%, while VTIP has yielded a comparatively lower 3.08% annualized return.


GLD

1D
0.26%
1M
-8.41%
YTD
0.24%
6M
3.07%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
29.71%
5Y*
17.55%
10Y*
12.56%

VTIP

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
1.76%
6M
1.89%
1Y
4.64%
3Y*
5.17%
5Y*
3.37%
10Y*
3.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. VTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.24%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%
VTIP
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
1.76%6.07%4.74%4.62%-2.94%5.36%4.95%4.86%0.56%0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and VTIP is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2012

0.34

The correlation between GLD and VTIP shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.38 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. VTIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

VTIP
VTIP Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
VTIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VTIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. VTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDVTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.66

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

6.66

-5.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.78

26.11

-22.33

GLD vs. VTIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the VTIP Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and VTIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDVTIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

3.12

-1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

1.22

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

1.13

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.89

-0.29

Drawdowns

GLD vs. VTIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than VTIP's maximum drawdown of -6.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and VTIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDVTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-6.27%

-39.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.10%

-0.70%

-19.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.10%

-0.98%

-19.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.03%

-5.50%

-15.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

-6.27%

-15.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.89%

-0.30%

-19.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-1.04%

-15.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.01%

0.18%

+7.83%

Volatility

GLD vs. VTIP - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) at 0.45%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDVTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

0.45%

+5.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.47%

1.05%

+22.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.87%

1.50%

+25.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.07%

2.78%

+15.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

2.74%

+13.25%

GLD vs. VTIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VTIP's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLD vs. VTIP - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTIP
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
3.59%3.81%2.70%2.86%6.84%4.68%1.20%1.95%2.45%1.52%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and VTIP have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to VTIP (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs VTIP's -6.27%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 12.56% vs 3.08% for VTIP. On fees, VTIP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 12.56% return vs 3.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTIP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

VTIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

GLD is categorized as Gold, while VTIP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while VTIP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.03% for VTIP.

VTIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and VTIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer