PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. USRD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. USRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Themes US R&D Champions ETF (USRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -2.52% return, which is significantly lower than USRD's 12.31% return.


GLD

1D
3.13%
1M
-10.77%
YTD
-2.52%
6M
-1.76%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
28.54%
5Y*
17.06%
10Y*
12.16%

USRD

1D
1.76%
1M
4.18%
YTD
12.31%
6M
9.99%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. USRD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-2.52%63.68%26.66%4.19%
USRD
Themes US R&D Champions ETF
12.31%12.44%15.53%5.32%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and USRD is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2023

0.17

GLD vs. USRD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLD
USRD

Basic Materials

100.0%
2.1%

Communication Services

-

7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.9%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

14.4%

Industrials

-

9.3%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Technology

-

58.5%

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

GLD
100.0%
USRD
2.1%

Communication Services

GLD

-

USRD
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

GLD

-

USRD
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

GLD

-

USRD
1.9%

Energy

GLD

-

USRD

-

Financial Services

GLD

-

USRD

-

Healthcare

GLD

-

USRD
14.4%

Industrials

GLD

-

USRD
9.3%

Real Estate

GLD

-

USRD
1.1%

Technology

GLD

-

USRD
58.5%

Utilities

GLD

-

USRD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. USRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

USRD
USRD Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
USRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
USRD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
USRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
USRD Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. USRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Themes US R&D Champions ETF (USRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDUSRDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.22

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

1.59

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.02

4.81

-1.79

GLD vs. USRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the USRD Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and USRD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLD vs. USRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than USRD's maximum drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and USRD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDUSRDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-23.79%

-21.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.46%

-13.49%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.10%

-7.42%

-14.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-3.71%

-12.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.38%

4.45%

+3.93%

Volatility

GLD vs. USRD - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Themes US R&D Champions ETF (USRD) have volatilities of 7.77% and 8.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDUSRDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

8.08%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.10%

14.50%

+9.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.37%

17.70%

+9.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.23%

19.49%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

19.49%

-3.41%

GLD vs. USRD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than USRD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLD vs. USRD - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM20252024
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%
USRD
Themes US R&D Champions ETF
0.38%0.42%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and USRD have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USRD has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to GLD (7.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs USRD's -23.79%.

On 1-year performance, GLD leads with 25.28% vs 21.33% for USRD. On fees, USRD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 7.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GLD has performed better with a 25.28% return vs 21.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USRD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

USRD has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

GLD is categorized as Gold, while USRD is Large Cap Blend Equities. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while USRD tracks Solactive US R&D Champions Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.29% for USRD.

USRD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and USRD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer