PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly lower than SHLD's -1.50% return.


GLD

1D
0.06%
1M
-10.21%
YTD
-2.47%
6M
-2.25%
1Y
23.81%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
17.08%
10Y*
12.15%

SHLD

1D
-2.04%
1M
0.05%
YTD
-1.50%
6M
-1.03%
1Y
10.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-2.47%63.68%26.66%7.71%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-1.50%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and SHLD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.26

GLD vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLD
SHLD

Basic Materials

100.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

88.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

11.8%

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

GLD
100.0%
SHLD

-

Communication Services

GLD

-

SHLD

-

Consumer Cyclical

GLD

-

SHLD

-

Consumer Defensive

GLD

-

SHLD

-

Energy

GLD

-

SHLD

-

Financial Services

GLD

-

SHLD

-

Healthcare

GLD

-

SHLD

-

Industrials

GLD

-

SHLD
88.2%

Real Estate

GLD

-

SHLD

-

Technology

GLD

-

SHLD
11.8%

Utilities

GLD

-

SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.09

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

0.52

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

1.28

+1.53

GLD vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLD vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than SHLD's maximum drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-20.10%

-25.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.46%

-20.10%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.05%

-18.20%

-3.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-3.34%

-12.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.49%

8.12%

+0.37%

Volatility

GLD vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is 7.79%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 9.05%. This indicates that GLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.79%

9.05%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.10%

19.94%

+4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.37%

24.55%

+2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.22%

21.29%

-3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

21.29%

-5.21%

GLD vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLD vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.


PositionTTM202520242023
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.56%0.55%0.53%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and SHLD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (9.05%) compared to GLD (7.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs SHLD's -20.10%.

On 1-year performance, GLD leads with 23.81% vs 10.40% for SHLD. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 7.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GLD has performed better with a 23.81% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHLD.

SHLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

GLD is categorized as Gold, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.50% for SHLD.

GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer