GLD vs. MCO
GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while MCO (Moody's Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GLD returned 12.15%/yr vs 17.53%/yr for MCO. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLD vs. MCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly higher than MCO's -11.93% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has underperformed MCO with an annualized return of 12.15%, while MCO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.53% annualized return.
GLD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -10.21%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -2.25%
- 1Y
- 23.81%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.15%
MCO
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- -11.93%
- 6M
- -7.54%
- 1Y
- -6.12%
- 3Y*
- 10.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 17.53%
GLD vs. MCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -2.47% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
MCO Moody's Corporation | -11.93% | 8.74% | 22.17% | 41.52% | -27.80% | 35.57% | 23.26% | 71.26% | -4.10% | 58.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLD and MCO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004 | 0.01 |
The correlation between GLD and MCO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLD vs. MCO — Risk / Return Rank
GLD
MCO
GLD vs. MCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Moody's Corporation (MCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLD | MCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.98 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | -0.26 | +1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.81 | -0.56 | +3.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLD vs. MCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum MCO drawdown of -78.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and MCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLD | MCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -78.72% | +33.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.46% | -23.61% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.46% | -24.65% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.46% | -41.66% | +17.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.46% | -42.02% | +17.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.05% | -16.63% | -5.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -17.76% | +1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.49% | 10.99% | -2.50% |
Volatility
GLD vs. MCO - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to Moody's Corporation (MCO) at 7.00%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLD | MCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.79% | 7.00% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.10% | 21.97% | +2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.37% | 26.40% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 26.33% | -8.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 27.84% | -11.76% |
Dividends
GLD vs. MCO - Dividend Comparison
GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MCO Moody's Corporation | 0.88% | 0.74% | 0.72% | 0.79% | 1.26% | 0.63% | 0.77% | 0.84% | 1.26% | 1.03% | 1.57% | 1.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLD and MCO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to MCO (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs MCO's -78.72%.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLD and MCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer