PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. MCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLD vs. MCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Moody's Corporation (MCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly higher than MCO's -11.93% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has underperformed MCO with an annualized return of 12.15%, while MCO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.53% annualized return.


GLD

1D
0.06%
1M
-10.21%
YTD
-2.47%
6M
-2.25%
1Y
23.81%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
17.08%
10Y*
12.15%

MCO

1D
1.36%
1M
2.42%
YTD
-11.93%
6M
-7.54%
1Y
-6.12%
3Y*
10.65%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
17.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. MCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-2.47%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%
MCO
Moody's Corporation
-11.93%8.74%22.17%41.52%-27.80%35.57%23.26%71.26%-4.10%58.53%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and MCO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004

0.01

The correlation between GLD and MCO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. MCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

MCO
MCO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCO Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. MCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Moody's Corporation (MCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLDMCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.98

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

-0.26

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

-0.56

+3.37

GLD vs. MCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the MCO Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and MCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLD vs. MCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum MCO drawdown of -78.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and MCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDMCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-78.72%

+33.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.46%

-23.61%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.46%

-24.65%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.46%

-41.66%

+17.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.46%

-42.02%

+17.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.05%

-16.63%

-5.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-17.76%

+1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.49%

10.99%

-2.50%

Volatility

GLD vs. MCO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to Moody's Corporation (MCO) at 7.00%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLDMCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.79%

7.00%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.10%

21.97%

+2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.37%

26.40%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.22%

26.33%

-8.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

27.84%

-11.76%

Dividends

GLD vs. MCO - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MCO
Moody's Corporation
0.88%0.74%0.72%0.79%1.26%0.63%0.77%0.84%1.26%1.03%1.57%1.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLD and MCO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to MCO (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs MCO's -78.72%.

GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLD and MCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer