GLD vs. LOW
GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while LOW (Lowe's Companies, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GLD returned 12.56%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for LOW. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GLD vs. LOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly higher than LOW's -12.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GLD having a 12.56% annualized return and LOW not far behind at 12.33%.
GLD
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 3.07%
- 1Y
- 30.18%
- 3Y*
- 29.71%
- 5Y*
- 17.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
LOW
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -9.26%
- YTD
- -12.96%
- 6M
- -14.26%
- 1Y
- -5.86%
- 3Y*
- 1.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.33%
GLD vs. LOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.24% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
LOW Lowe's Companies, Inc. | -12.96% | -0.33% | 13.01% | 14.03% | -21.49% | 63.34% | 36.40% | 32.23% | 1.22% | 33.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLD and LOW is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2004 | -0.02 |
The correlation between GLD and LOW shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLD vs. LOW — Risk / Return Rank
GLD
LOW
GLD vs. LOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLD | LOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.98 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | -0.21 | +1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.78 | -0.49 | +4.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLD | LOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | -0.23 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.14 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.42 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.46 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
GLD vs. LOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum LOW drawdown of -62.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and LOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLD | LOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -62.52% | +16.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.10% | -27.75% | +7.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.10% | -27.75% | +7.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.03% | -33.86% | +12.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.00% | -48.63% | +26.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.89% | -27.29% | +7.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -16.60% | +0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.01% | 11.96% | -3.95% |
Volatility
GLD vs. LOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is 5.68%, while Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that GLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLD | LOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 6.36% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.47% | 19.88% | +3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.87% | 25.77% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 26.15% | -8.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.99% | 29.14% | -13.15% |
Dividends
GLD vs. LOW - Dividend Comparison
GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LOW Lowe's Companies, Inc. | 2.31% | 1.95% | 1.82% | 1.93% | 1.86% | 1.08% | 1.40% | 1.72% | 1.93% | 1.64% | 1.77% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLD and LOW have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOW has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to GLD (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs LOW's -62.52%.
GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GLD and LOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer