GLD vs. KGLD
GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) and KGLD (Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF ) are both exchange-traded funds - GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while KGLD is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv. GLD is passively managed, while KGLD is actively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GLD charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for KGLD.
Performance
GLD vs. KGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GLD having a 2.92% return and KGLD slightly higher at 2.99%.
GLD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 31.09%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
KGLD
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLD vs. KGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 2.92% | 30.30% |
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 2.99% | 29.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLD and KGLD is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLD vs. KGLD — Risk / Return Rank
GLD
KGLD
GLD vs. KGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLD | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLD | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.32 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
GLD vs. KGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, which is greater than KGLD's maximum drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and KGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLD | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -20.29% | -25.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.75% | -19.40% | +1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -6.10% | -10.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.73% | — | — |
Volatility
GLD vs. KGLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLD | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.61% | 28.72% | -2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 28.72% | -10.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 28.72% | -12.77% |
GLD vs. KGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than KGLD's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLD vs. KGLD - Dividend Comparison
GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 12.64% | 4.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, GLD and KGLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KGLD.
KGLD has the higher dividend yield at 12.64%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
GLD is categorized as Gold, while KGLD is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 1.00% for KGLD.
Find the right allocation for GLD and KGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer