PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLD vs. GDMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GLD vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GLD vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
8.57%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%1.67%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
8.77%237.09%28.23%12.97%-14.62%5.11%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GLD having a 8.57% return and GDMN slightly higher at 8.77%.


GLD

1D
3.79%
1M
-11.05%
YTD
8.57%
6M
21.05%
1Y
49.33%
3Y*
32.92%
5Y*
21.58%
10Y*
13.92%

GDMN

1D
9.38%
1M
-27.72%
YTD
8.77%
6M
31.63%
1Y
140.14%
3Y*
65.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GLD vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GLD vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

GDMN
GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLDGDMNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

2.20

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.21

2.34

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

3.69

-1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.90

12.63

-2.72

GLD vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and GDMN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLDGDMNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.20

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.94

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and GDMN is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GLD vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%.


TTM2025202420232022
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
2.48%2.70%9.44%7.69%1.44%

Drawdowns

GLD vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and GDMN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GLDGDMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-52.82%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.21%

-39.03%

+19.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.23%

-28.60%

+15.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-18.45%

+2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.20%

11.39%

-6.19%

Volatility

GLD vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is 11.06%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 24.97%. This indicates that GLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GLDGDMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.06%

24.97%

-13.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.30%

53.89%

-29.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.80%

63.99%

-36.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.74%

47.19%

-29.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.87%

47.19%

-31.32%