GLD vs. GDMN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. GLD is passively managed, while GDMN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, GLD returned 31.09%/yr vs 60.95%/yr for GDMN. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GLD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.

Performance

GLD vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -4.13% return.

GLD

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 2.92%
• 6M: 5.43%
• 1Y: 32.04%
• 3Y*: 31.09%
• 5Y*: 18.15%
• 10Y*: 13.12%

GDMN

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: -4.13%
• 6M: 2.73%
• 1Y: 76.93%
• 3Y*: 60.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLD vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GLD SPDR Gold Shares	2.92%	63.68%	26.66%	12.69%	-0.77%	1.67%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-4.13%	237.09%	28.23%	12.97%	-14.62%	5.11%

Correlation

The correlation between GLD and GDMN is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021	0.90

The correlation between GLD and GDMN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

GLD vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GLD	GDMN
Basic Materials	100.0%	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GLD vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLD

GLD Risk / Return Rank: 32
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 35
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 28

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 34
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLD vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLD	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.26	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	1.68	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.25	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	1.98	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.15	4.68	-0.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLD vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLD and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLD	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.21	1.26	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.80	-0.20

Drawdowns

GLD vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and GDMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLD	GDMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.56%	-52.82%	+7.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.21%	-39.03%	+19.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.21%	-39.03%	+19.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.75%	-37.06%	+19.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.16%	-18.89%	+2.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.73%	16.51%	-8.78%

Volatility

GLD vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is 5.51%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 17.94%. This indicates that GLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLD	GDMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.51%	17.94%	-12.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.16%	51.79%	-28.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.61%	61.32%	-34.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.00%	47.59%	-29.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.95%	47.59%	-31.64%

GLD vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLD vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	2.82%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%
GLD SPDR Gold Shares	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLD and GDMN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, GLD and GDMN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GLD or GDMN?

GDMN has higher volatility (17.94%) compared to GLD (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLD dropped -45.56% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

Which ETF is better, GLD or GDMN?

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 60.95% vs 31.09% for GLD. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GLD or GDMN?

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 60.95% return vs 31.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GLD or GDMN?

GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GLD or GDMN?

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

What is the main difference between GLD and GDMN?

GLD is categorized as Gold, while GDMN is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GLD and 0.45% for GDMN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.