GLD vs. 1CS.MI
GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM, while 1CS.MI (AXA SA) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GLD returned 12.15%/yr vs 13.41%/yr for 1CS.MI. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GLD vs. 1CS.MI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLD is traded in USD, while 1CS.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 1CS.MI values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLD achieves a -2.47% return, which is significantly lower than 1CS.MI's -0.20% return. Over the past 10 years, GLD has underperformed 1CS.MI with an annualized return of 12.15%, while 1CS.MI has yielded a comparatively higher 13.41% annualized return.
GLD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -2.25%
- 1Y
- 22.21%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.15%
1CS.MI
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 0.70%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- 17.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.41%
GLD vs. 1CS.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -2.47% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
1CS.MI AXA SA | -0.20% | 43.45% | 16.04% | 22.75% | 0.59% | 31.05% | -2.29% | 39.46% | -23.86% | 23.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLD and 1CS.MI is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007 | 0.08 |
The correlation between GLD and 1CS.MI shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (10 years) to 0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLD vs. 1CS.MI — Risk / Return Rank
GLD
1CS.MI
GLD vs. 1CS.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) and AXA SA (1CS.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GLD | 1CS.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.03 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | -0.01 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.81 | -0.02 | +2.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GLD vs. 1CS.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLD drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum 1CS.MI drawdown of -82.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLD and 1CS.MI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLD | 1CS.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.56% | -82.88% | +37.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.46% | -14.08% | -10.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.46% | -16.43% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.46% | -32.77% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.46% | -55.61% | +31.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.05% | -4.06% | -17.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -25.07% | +8.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.49% | 7.52% | +0.97% |
Volatility
GLD vs. 1CS.MI - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a higher volatility of 7.79% compared to AXA SA (1CS.MI) at 6.08%. This indicates that GLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1CS.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLD | 1CS.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.79% | 6.08% | +1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.10% | 20.44% | +3.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.37% | 26.45% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 26.46% | -8.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 28.99% | -12.91% |
Dividends
GLD vs. 1CS.MI - Dividend Comparison
GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 1CS.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1CS.MI AXA SA | 5.91% | 5.22% | 5.80% | 5.77% | 5.85% | 5.43% | 10.97% | 5.32% | 6.72% | 4.68% | 4.60% | 3.74% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLD and 1CS.MI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GLD and 1CS.MI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer