PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLBL vs. MSDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLBL vs. MSDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL) and GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLBL achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly higher than MSDD's -48.72% return.


GLBL

1D
-1.70%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
8.96%
6M
8.11%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSDD

1D
0.00%
1M
44.94%
YTD
-48.72%
6M
-45.00%
1Y
69.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLBL vs. MSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GLBL and MSDD is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025

-0.45

GLBL vs. MSDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLBL
MSDD

Technology

36.5%
200.1%

Communication Services

15.9%

-

Financial Services

14.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%

-

Healthcare

7.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.2%

-

Industrials

3.3%

-

Real Estate

3.1%

-

Basic Materials

1.3%

-

Energy

1.3%

-

Utilities

0.4%

-

Technology

GLBL
36.5%
MSDD
200.1%

Communication Services

GLBL
15.9%
MSDD

-

Financial Services

GLBL
14.0%
MSDD

-

Consumer Cyclical

GLBL
12.5%
MSDD

-

Healthcare

GLBL
7.3%
MSDD

-

Consumer Defensive

GLBL
4.2%
MSDD

-

Industrials

GLBL
3.3%
MSDD

-

Real Estate

GLBL
3.1%
MSDD

-

Basic Materials

GLBL
1.3%
MSDD

-

Energy

GLBL
1.3%
MSDD

-

Utilities

GLBL
0.4%
MSDD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLBL vs. MSDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLBL
GLBL Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GLBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLBL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
GLBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLBL Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MSDD
MSDD Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLBL vs. MSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL) and GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLBLMSDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.21

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

0.82

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.33

1.63

+7.70

GLBL vs. MSDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the MSDD Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLBL and MSDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLBL vs. MSDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLBL drawdown since its inception was -19.75%, smaller than the maximum MSDD drawdown of -84.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLBL and MSDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLBLMSDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.75%

-84.91%

+65.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-84.91%

+73.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.27%

-68.63%

+64.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-31.26%

+28.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

43.14%

-40.37%

Volatility

GLBL vs. MSDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL) is 5.99%, while GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) has a volatility of 32.28%. This indicates that GLBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLBLMSDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

32.28%

-26.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

124.65%

-113.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.40%

140.94%

-126.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.77%

138.85%

-122.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

138.85%

-122.08%

GLBL vs. MSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLBL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLBL vs. MSDD - Dividend Comparison

GLBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, while MSDD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
GLBL
Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF
0.78%0.86%0.15%
MSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLBL and MSDD have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSDD has higher volatility (32.28%) compared to GLBL (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLBL dropped -19.75% vs MSDD's -84.91%.

On 1-year performance, MSDD leads with 69.58% vs 25.78% for GLBL. On fees, GLBL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, GLBL has been the lower-risk option at 5.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSDD has performed better with a 69.58% return vs 25.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLBL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSDD.

GLBL has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for MSDD.

GLBL is categorized as Global Equities, while MSDD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GLBL and 1.50% for MSDD.

GLBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLBL and MSDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer