PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLBL vs. MSDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLBL vs. MSDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL) and GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLBL achieves a 13.05% return, which is significantly higher than MSDD's -47.16% return.


GLBL

1D
-0.46%
1M
5.74%
YTD
13.05%
6M
13.02%
1Y
31.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSDD

1D
13.67%
1M
85.18%
YTD
-47.16%
6M
-24.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLBL vs. MSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GLBL and MSDD is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

-0.47

GLBL vs. MSDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLBL
MSDD

Technology

38.7%
200.1%

Communication Services

16.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%

-

Financial Services

12.6%

-

Healthcare

6.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.9%

-

Industrials

3.4%

-

Real Estate

3.1%

-

Energy

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Utilities

0.4%

-

Technology

GLBL
38.7%
MSDD
200.1%

Communication Services

GLBL
16.2%
MSDD

-

Consumer Cyclical

GLBL
12.9%
MSDD

-

Financial Services

GLBL
12.6%
MSDD

-

Healthcare

GLBL
6.3%
MSDD

-

Consumer Defensive

GLBL
3.9%
MSDD

-

Industrials

GLBL
3.4%
MSDD

-

Real Estate

GLBL
3.1%
MSDD

-

Energy

GLBL
1.4%
MSDD

-

Basic Materials

GLBL
1.1%
MSDD

-

Utilities

GLBL
0.4%
MSDD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLBL vs. MSDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLBL
GLBL Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
GLBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GLBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLBL Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

MSDD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLBL vs. MSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF (GLBL) and GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLBLMSDDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.86

GLBL vs. MSDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLBLMSDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.43

0.70

+0.73

Drawdowns

GLBL vs. MSDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLBL drawdown since its inception was -19.75%, smaller than the maximum MSDD drawdown of -84.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLBL and MSDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLBLMSDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.75%

-84.91%

+65.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-67.67%

+66.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-29.42%

+26.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

Volatility

GLBL vs. MSDD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLBLMSDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

141.56%

-128.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.48%

141.56%

-125.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.48%

141.56%

-125.08%

GLBL vs. MSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLBL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLBL vs. MSDD - Dividend Comparison

GLBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while MSDD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
GLBL
Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF
0.76%0.86%0.15%
MSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLBL and MSDD have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLBL is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLBL is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSDD.

GLBL has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for MSDD.

GLBL is categorized as Global Equities, while MSDD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for GLBL and 1.50% for MSDD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLBL and MSDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer