GLBL.L vs. USDV.L
GLBL.L (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged) and USDV.L (SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis) are both exchange-traded funds - GLBL.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while USDV.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLBL.L returned -2.93%/yr vs 6.79%/yr for USDV.L. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GLBL.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for USDV.L.
Performance
GLBL.L vs. USDV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLBL.L achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than USDV.L's 7.22% return.
GLBL.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- -1.47%
- 6M
- -1.76%
- 1Y
- 0.11%
- 3Y*
- -2.10%
- 5Y*
- -2.93%
- 10Y*
- —
USDV.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- 14.02%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
GLBL.L vs. USDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLBL.L SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged | -1.47% | -2.39% | -2.65% | -2.45% | -7.22% | -5.08% | 3.70% | 1.65% | 7.05% |
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 7.22% | 1.15% | 9.34% | -3.52% | 11.58% | 26.74% | -2.72% | 19.69% | 4.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLBL.L and USDV.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2018 | 0.21 |
The correlation between GLBL.L and USDV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.37 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GLBL.L vs. USDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLBL.L
USDV.L
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
GLBL.L
USDV.L
Communication Services
GLBL.L
USDV.L
Consumer Cyclical
GLBL.L
USDV.L
Healthcare
GLBL.L
USDV.L
Utilities
GLBL.L
USDV.L
Consumer Defensive
GLBL.L
USDV.L
Energy
GLBL.L
USDV.L
Technology
GLBL.L
USDV.L
Industrials
GLBL.L
USDV.L
Basic Materials
GLBL.L
USDV.L
Real Estate
GLBL.L
USDV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLBL.L vs. USDV.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLBL.L
USDV.L
GLBL.L vs. USDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLBL.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.25 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | 2.12 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.04 | 5.42 | -5.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLBL.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 1.44 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.43 | 0.53 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 0.84 | -1.00 |
Drawdowns
GLBL.L vs. USDV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLBL.L drawdown since its inception was -25.17%, smaller than the maximum USDV.L drawdown of -27.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLBL.L and USDV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLBL.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.17% | -27.80% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.16% | -6.60% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.09% | -16.30% | +8.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.62% | -16.30% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.05% | -3.68% | -20.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.84% | -4.14% | -8.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.58% | +0.11% |
Volatility
GLBL.L vs. USDV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L) is 1.36%, while SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) has a volatility of 2.53%. This indicates that GLBL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLBL.L | USDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 2.53% | -1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.61% | 7.19% | -3.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.00% | 9.69% | -4.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.74% | 12.78% | -6.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.27% | 15.33% | -8.06% |
GLBL.L vs. USDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLBL.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than USDV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GLBL.L vs. USDV.L - Dividend Comparison
GLBL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than USDV.L's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLBL.L SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USDV.L SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis | 2.04% | 2.20% | 1.99% | 2.29% | 2.11% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 2.65% | 2.19% | 3.07% | 1.65% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLBL.L and USDV.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLBL.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLBL.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for USDV.L.
GLBL.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while USDV.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. GLBL.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLBL.L and 0.35% for USDV.L.
Find the right allocation for GLBL.L and USDV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer