GLBIX vs. RMGSX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GLBIX (Leuthold Global Fund) and RMGSX (Russell Investments Multi-Asset Growth Strategy Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, GLBIX returned 6.67%/yr vs 6.22%/yr for RMGSX. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GLBIX charges 1.57%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for RMGSX.

Performance

GLBIX vs. RMGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leuthold Global Fund (GLBIX) and Russell Investments Multi-Asset Growth Strategy Fund (RMGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLBIX achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly higher than RMGSX's 6.86% return.

GLBIX

• 1D: 1.82%
• 1M: -0.09%
• 6M: 7.16%
• YTD: 12.61%
• 1Y: 21.40%
• 3Y*: 11.26%
• 5Y*: 6.67%
• 10Y*: 6.37%
• ALL TIME*: 7.33%

RMGSX

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: -0.48%
• 6M: 4.22%
• YTD: 6.86%
• 1Y: 15.13%
• 3Y*: 12.31%
• 5Y*: 6.22%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GLBIX Leuthold Global Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RMGSX Russell Investments Multi-Asset Growth Strategy Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

GLBIX vs. RMGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GLBIX Leuthold Global Fund	12.61%	17.72%	1.08%	8.32%	-7.91%	15.01%	7.52%	9.36%	-12.85%	11.54%
RMGSX Russell Investments Multi-Asset Growth Strategy Fund	6.86%	17.38%	8.76%	15.26%	-14.73%	7.88%	3.14%	9.22%	-4.92%	5.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GLBIX and RMGSX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017	0.77

The correlation between GLBIX and RMGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GLBIX vs. RMGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GLBIX

GLBIX Risk / Return Rank: 86
GLBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
GLBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
GLBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GLBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GLBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

RMGSX

RMGSX Risk / Return Rank: 69
RMGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RMGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
RMGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
RMGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
RMGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GLBIX vs. RMGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leuthold Global Fund (GLBIX) and Russell Investments Multi-Asset Growth Strategy Fund (RMGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GLBIX	RMGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	1.78	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	2.51	+0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.33	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	2.14	+1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.83	9.01	+1.82

GLBIX vs. RMGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLBIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the RMGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLBIX and RMGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GLBIX vs. RMGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLBIX drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, which is greater than RMGSX's maximum drawdown of -24.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLBIX and RMGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLBIX	RMGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.82%	-24.93%	-1.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.39%	-6.73%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.39%	-8.85%	+2.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.14%	-23.20%	+7.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.74%	-1.25%	-1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.84%	-4.13%	-0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	1.59%	+0.37%

Volatility

GLBIX vs. RMGSX - Volatility Comparison

Leuthold Global Fund (GLBIX) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to Russell Investments Multi-Asset Growth Strategy Fund (RMGSX) at 2.43%. This indicates that GLBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLBIX	RMGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	2.43%	+1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.63%	6.76%	+1.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.87%	8.10%	+1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.28%	10.36%	-1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.60%	10.26%	-0.66%

GLBIX vs. RMGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLBIX has a 1.57% expense ratio, which is higher than RMGSX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

GLBIX vs. RMGSX - Dividend Comparison

GLBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.63%, more than RMGSX's 4.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLBIX Leuthold Global Fund	8.63%	9.71%	8.31%	2.52%	5.18%	1.89%	0.25%	1.04%	8.48%	9.31%	9.66%	3.75%
RMGSX Russell Investments Multi-Asset Growth Strategy Fund	4.09%	4.32%	3.60%	3.48%	0.76%	6.27%	0.80%	3.35%	2.46%	1.33%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GLBIX and RMGSX in my portfolio?

GLBIX and RMGSX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GLBIX or RMGSX?

GLBIX has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to RMGSX (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLBIX dropped -26.82% vs RMGSX's -24.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.