PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLBIX vs. PGP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLBIX vs. PGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leuthold Global Fund (GLBIX) and PIMCO Global StocksPLUS & Income Fund (PGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLBIX achieves a 15.78% return, which is significantly higher than PGP's -2.23% return. Over the past 10 years, GLBIX has outperformed PGP with an annualized return of 7.13%, while PGP has yielded a comparatively lower 1.74% annualized return.


GLBIX

1D
0.55%
1M
3.80%
YTD
15.78%
6M
15.54%
1Y
27.34%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
7.13%

PGP

1D
-0.58%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
-2.23%
6M
0.18%
1Y
16.51%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
1.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLBIX vs. PGP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLBIX
Leuthold Global Fund
15.78%17.72%1.08%8.32%-7.91%15.01%7.52%9.36%-12.85%16.84%
PGP
PIMCO Global StocksPLUS & Income Fund
-2.23%29.92%15.48%21.33%-29.19%16.38%-6.98%12.73%-15.75%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between GLBIX and PGP is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009

0.37

The correlation between GLBIX and PGP shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLBIX vs. PGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLBIX
GLBIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GLBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GLBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

PGP
PGP Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGP Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGP Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLBIX vs. PGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leuthold Global Fund (GLBIX) and PIMCO Global StocksPLUS & Income Fund (PGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLBIXPGPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.24

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

1.27

+3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.38

4.50

+10.88

GLBIX vs. PGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLBIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the PGP Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLBIX and PGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLBIX vs. PGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLBIX drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum PGP drawdown of -64.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLBIX and PGP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLBIXPGPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.82%

-64.94%

+38.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-13.05%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.39%

-21.01%

+14.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

-39.87%

+23.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.82%

-64.55%

+37.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.34%

+6.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-15.96%

+11.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

3.68%

-1.87%

Volatility

GLBIX vs. PGP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leuthold Global Fund (GLBIX) is 4.04%, while PIMCO Global StocksPLUS & Income Fund (PGP) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that GLBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLBIXPGPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

4.44%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.78%

11.44%

-3.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.09%

13.18%

-4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.15%

18.46%

-9.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.65%

26.39%

-16.74%

Dividends

GLBIX vs. PGP - Dividend Comparison

GLBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.39%, less than PGP's 9.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLBIX
Leuthold Global Fund
8.39%9.71%8.31%2.52%5.18%1.89%0.25%1.04%8.48%9.31%9.66%3.75%
PGP
PIMCO Global StocksPLUS & Income Fund
9.72%9.07%10.64%11.04%11.95%7.65%9.49%10.13%12.53%11.44%14.86%12.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLBIX and PGP have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGP has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to GLBIX (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLBIX dropped -26.82% vs PGP's -64.94%.

GLBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLBIX and PGP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer