PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLAG.L vs. UDVD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLAG.L vs. UDVD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLAG.L achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than UDVD.L's 6.99% return.


GLAG.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.02%
6M
0.44%
1Y
2.30%
3Y*
3.39%
5Y*
-1.75%
10Y*

UDVD.L

1D
0.11%
1M
0.79%
YTD
6.99%
6M
7.81%
1Y
12.89%
3Y*
9.74%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
8.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLAG.L vs. UDVD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLAG.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged
0.02%7.79%-1.43%5.30%-16.03%-5.16%9.05%5.87%-3.11%
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
6.99%8.57%7.64%2.06%-0.33%25.04%0.77%22.66%-5.47%

Correlation

The correlation between GLAG.L and UDVD.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2018

0.15

Over the past year, GLAG.L and UDVD.L have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

GLAG.L vs. UDVD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GLAG.L
UDVD.L

Financial Services

13.0%
11.5%

Energy

2.1%
4.5%

Communication Services

2.1%
3.5%

Industrials

1.6%
17.5%

Technology

1.6%
8.9%

Healthcare

1.5%
6.2%

Utilities

1.4%
14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%
17.0%

Basic Materials

0.2%
6.4%

Real Estate

0.2%
4.6%

Financial Services

GLAG.L
13.0%
UDVD.L
11.5%

Energy

GLAG.L
2.1%
UDVD.L
4.5%

Communication Services

GLAG.L
2.1%
UDVD.L
3.5%

Industrials

GLAG.L
1.6%
UDVD.L
17.5%

Technology

GLAG.L
1.6%
UDVD.L
8.9%

Healthcare

GLAG.L
1.5%
UDVD.L
6.2%

Utilities

GLAG.L
1.4%
UDVD.L
14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GLAG.L
1.3%
UDVD.L
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

GLAG.L
1.3%
UDVD.L
17.0%

Basic Materials

GLAG.L
0.2%
UDVD.L
6.4%

Real Estate

GLAG.L
0.2%
UDVD.L
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLAG.L vs. UDVD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLAG.L
GLAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GLAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GLAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

UDVD.L
UDVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLAG.L vs. UDVD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLAG.LUDVD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.23

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

1.82

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.80

4.63

-2.83

GLAG.L vs. UDVD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLAG.L and UDVD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLAG.LUDVD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

1.29

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

0.41

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.71

-0.71

Drawdowns

GLAG.L vs. UDVD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLAG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.75%, smaller than the maximum UDVD.L drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLAG.L and UDVD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLAG.LUDVD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.75%

-36.12%

+10.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.53%

-7.06%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.86%

-15.26%

+8.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.25%

-15.26%

-8.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.98%

-3.61%

-7.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.75%

-3.44%

-6.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

2.78%

-1.50%

Volatility

GLAG.L vs. UDVD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L) is 1.98%, while SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that GLAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UDVD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLAG.LUDVD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

2.64%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.82%

7.08%

-3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96%

9.92%

-4.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.50%

13.92%

-7.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.79%

15.70%

-9.91%

GLAG.L vs. UDVD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLAG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than UDVD.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLAG.L vs. UDVD.L - Dividend Comparison

GLAG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than UDVD.L's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLAG.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged
3.15%3.00%2.80%2.02%1.48%1.24%1.47%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.05%2.17%2.03%2.24%2.13%2.15%2.36%2.01%2.27%1.78%1.83%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLAG.L and UDVD.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLAG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLAG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UDVD.L.

GLAG.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while UDVD.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. GLAG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while UDVD.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLAG.L and 0.35% for UDVD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLAG.L and UDVD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer