PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLAG.L vs. GLAD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLAG.L vs. GLAD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (GLAD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLAG.L achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than GLAD.L's 0.54% return.


GLAG.L

1D
0.08%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.02%
6M
0.44%
1Y
2.30%
3Y*
3.39%
5Y*
-1.75%
10Y*

GLAD.L

1D
0.15%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.72%
1Y
3.48%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
0.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLAG.L vs. GLAD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GLAG.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged
0.02%7.79%-1.43%5.30%-16.03%-5.16%9.05%0.54%
GLAD.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
0.54%4.72%3.23%6.73%-11.24%-1.59%5.21%-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between GLAG.L and GLAD.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2019

0.76

The correlation between GLAG.L and GLAD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLAG.L vs. GLAD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLAG.L
GLAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GLAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
GLAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

GLAD.L
GLAD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GLAD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLAD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLAD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GLAD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLAD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLAG.L vs. GLAD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (GLAD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLAG.LGLAD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.20

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

1.51

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.80

4.60

-2.80

GLAG.L vs. GLAD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the GLAD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLAG.L and GLAD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLAG.LGLAD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

1.09

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.27

0.15

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.23

-0.23

Drawdowns

GLAG.L vs. GLAD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLAG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.75%, which is greater than GLAD.L's maximum drawdown of -15.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLAG.L and GLAD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLAG.LGLAD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.75%

-15.20%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.53%

-2.30%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.86%

-3.78%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.25%

-15.05%

-9.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.98%

-1.01%

-9.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.75%

-4.55%

-5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

0.76%

+0.52%

Volatility

GLAG.L vs. GLAD.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.98% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (GLAD.L) at 1.38%. This indicates that GLAG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLAD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLAG.LGLAD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

1.38%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.82%

2.63%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.96%

3.19%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.50%

4.48%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.79%

4.27%

+1.52%

GLAG.L vs. GLAD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GLAG.L and GLAD.L have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLAG.L vs. GLAD.L - Dividend Comparison

GLAG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, while GLAD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GLAD.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GLAG.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged
3.15%3.00%2.80%2.02%1.48%1.24%1.47%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLAG.L and GLAD.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLAG.L and GLAD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

GLAG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while GLAD.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLAG.L and GLAD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer