GLAG.L vs. GAGG.L
GLAG.L (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged) and GAGG.L (Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M) are both Global Bonds funds tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, from State Street and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GLAG.L returned -1.75%/yr vs -1.80%/yr for GAGG.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GLAG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for GAGG.L.
Performance
GLAG.L vs. GAGG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GLAG.L is traded in USD, while GAGG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GAGG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GLAG.L achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly higher than GAGG.L's -0.17% return.
GLAG.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 2.30%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- -1.75%
- 10Y*
- —
GAGG.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 2.15%
- 3Y*
- 3.24%
- 5Y*
- -1.80%
- 10Y*
- —
GLAG.L vs. GAGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLAG.L SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged | 0.02% | 7.79% | -1.43% | 5.30% | -16.03% | -5.16% | 9.05% | 5.87% | -3.11% |
GAGG.L Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M | -0.17% | 8.00% | -1.48% | 4.50% | -16.02% | -4.78% | 8.87% | 7.27% | -2.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between GLAG.L and GAGG.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2018 | 0.64 |
The correlation between GLAG.L and GAGG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.68 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GLAG.L vs. GAGG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GLAG.L
GAGG.L
Financial Services
Energy
-
Communication Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
GLAG.L
GAGG.L
Energy
GLAG.L
GAGG.L
-
Communication Services
GLAG.L
GAGG.L
Industrials
GLAG.L
GAGG.L
Technology
GLAG.L
GAGG.L
Healthcare
GLAG.L
GAGG.L
Utilities
GLAG.L
GAGG.L
Consumer Cyclical
GLAG.L
GAGG.L
Consumer Defensive
GLAG.L
GAGG.L
Basic Materials
GLAG.L
GAGG.L
-
Real Estate
GLAG.L
GAGG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GLAG.L vs. GAGG.L — Risk / Return Rank
GLAG.L
GAGG.L
GLAG.L vs. GAGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L) and Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M (GAGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GLAG.L | GAGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.06 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.65 | 0.53 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | 1.49 | +0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GLAG.L | GAGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 0.37 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | -0.25 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.08 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
GLAG.L vs. GAGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GLAG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.75%, roughly equal to the maximum GAGG.L drawdown of -26.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLAG.L and GAGG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GLAG.L | GAGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.75% | -26.02% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.53% | -4.06% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.86% | -6.95% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.25% | -24.43% | +0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.98% | -11.60% | +0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.75% | -9.34% | -0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.28% | 1.44% | -0.16% |
Volatility
GLAG.L vs. GAGG.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLAG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.98% compared to Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M (GAGG.L) at 1.87%. This indicates that GLAG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GLAG.L | GAGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.98% | 1.87% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.82% | 4.46% | -0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.96% | 5.85% | -0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.50% | 7.23% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.79% | 6.86% | -1.07% |
GLAG.L vs. GAGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GLAG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than GAGG.L's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GLAG.L vs. GAGG.L - Dividend Comparison
GLAG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, while GAGG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAGG.L Amundi Index Barclays Global Agg 500M | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLAG.L SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged | 3.15% | 3.00% | 2.80% | 2.02% | 1.48% | 1.24% | 1.47% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GLAG.L and GAGG.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GAGG.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GAGG.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLAG.L.
Both ETFs track Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for GLAG.L and 0.03% for GAGG.L.
Find the right allocation for GLAG.L and GAGG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer