GLAB.L vs. XG7S.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) and Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.L).

GLAB.L and XG7S.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GLAB.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. It was launched on Feb 14, 2018. XG7S.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. It was launched on Aug 14, 2013. Both GLAB.L and XG7S.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

GLAB.L vs. XG7S.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) and Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GLAB.L vs. XG7S.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GLAB.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged	-0.01%	4.68%	-381.08%	5.73%	-12.07%	-1.74%	4.48%	6.42%	1.00%
XG7S.L Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C	-0.06%	-0.22%	-1.85%	-0.74%	-8.86%	-6.63%	6.73%	1.94%	7.90%

Different Trading Currencies

GLAB.L is traded in GBP, while XG7S.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XG7S.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLAB.L achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly higher than XG7S.L's -0.06% return.

GLAB.L

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -1.23%
• YTD: -0.01%
• 6M: 0.79%
• 1Y: 3.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XG7S.L

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: -0.06%
• 6M: -0.05%
• 1Y: 0.11%
• 3Y*: -1.44%
• 5Y*: -2.29%
• 10Y*: 0.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLAB.L vs. XG7S.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLAB.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XG7S.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XG7S.L

Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C

GLAB.L

SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged

Return for Risk

GLAB.L vs. XG7S.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLAB.L

GLAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 49
GLAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
GLAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
GLAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 42
GLAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
GLAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 50

XG7S.L

XG7S.L Risk / Return Rank: 12
XG7S.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
XG7S.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
XG7S.L Omega Ratio Rank: 15
XG7S.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
XG7S.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLAB.L vs. XG7S.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) and Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GLAB.L	XG7S.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	0.01	+0.99
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	0.17	+1.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.05	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	-0.08	+1.59
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.20	-0.13	+5.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GLAB.L vs. XG7S.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLAB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the XG7S.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLAB.L and XG7S.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GLAB.L	XG7S.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	0.01	+0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.17	—

Correlation

The correlation between GLAB.L and XG7S.L is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GLAB.L vs. XG7S.L - Dividend Comparison

GLAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, while XG7S.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GLAB.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged	3.11%	3.06%	139.91%	1.91%	1.48%	1.18%	1.51%	1.70%	0.88%
XG7S.L Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GLAB.L vs. XG7S.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLAB.L drawdown since its inception was -372.79%, which is greater than XG7S.L's maximum drawdown of -25.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLAB.L and XG7S.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GLAB.L	XG7S.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-372.79%	-25.59%	-347.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.26%	-15.16%	+12.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-373.54%	-16.70%	-356.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-368.60%	-23.12%	-345.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-78.27%	-15.25%	-63.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.66%	9.15%	-8.49%

Volatility

GLAB.L vs. XG7S.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) is 1.29%, while Xtrackers Global Government Bond UCITS ETF 5C (XG7S.L) has a volatility of 1.64%. This indicates that GLAB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XG7S.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GLAB.L	XG7S.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.29%	1.64%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.94%	19.53%	-17.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.30%	21.27%	-17.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	165.77%	14.47%	+151.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	130.00%	14.83%	+115.17%