PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLAB.L vs. SPY5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GLAB.L vs. SPY5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GLAB.L vs. SPY5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GLAB.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged
-0.01%4.68%-381.08%5.73%-12.07%-1.74%4.48%6.42%1.00%
SPY5.L
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
-2.47%9.06%27.55%20.31%-9.02%30.50%14.06%25.87%2.47%
Different Trading Currencies

GLAB.L is traded in GBP, while SPY5.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPY5.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLAB.L achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly higher than SPY5.L's -2.47% return.


GLAB.L

1D
0.33%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
-0.01%
6M
0.79%
1Y
3.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPY5.L

1D
2.26%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
-2.47%
6M
0.76%
1Y
15.40%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
14.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GLAB.L vs. SPY5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLAB.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY5.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

GLAB.L vs. SPY5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLAB.L
GLAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GLAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GLAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY5.L
SPY5.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SPY5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLAB.L vs. SPY5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLAB.LSPY5.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.99

0.98

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.39

1.42

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.20

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

2.15

-0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.20

6.95

-1.75

GLAB.L vs. SPY5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLAB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the SPY5.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLAB.L and SPY5.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLAB.LSPY5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

0.98

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

Correlation

The correlation between GLAB.L and SPY5.L is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

GLAB.L vs. SPY5.L - Dividend Comparison

GLAB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than SPY5.L's 1.02% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLAB.L
SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged
3.11%3.06%139.91%1.91%1.48%1.18%1.51%1.70%0.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY5.L
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF
1.02%0.97%1.06%1.19%1.40%0.99%1.28%1.71%2.20%2.29%1.64%1.73%

Drawdowns

GLAB.L vs. SPY5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLAB.L drawdown since its inception was -372.79%, which is greater than SPY5.L's maximum drawdown of -25.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLAB.L and SPY5.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GLAB.LSPY5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-372.79%

-33.89%

-338.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.26%

-11.75%

+9.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-373.54%

-24.37%

-349.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-368.60%

-5.37%

-363.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-78.27%

-3.74%

-74.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

2.05%

-1.39%

Volatility

GLAB.L vs. SPY5.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) is 1.29%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPY5.L) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that GLAB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GLAB.LSPY5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

4.86%

-3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.94%

9.02%

-7.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30%

15.70%

-12.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

165.77%

15.34%

+150.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

130.00%

16.46%

+113.54%