PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GJUN vs. HOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GJUN vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GJUN

1D
0.01%
1M
0.83%
YTD
3.73%
6M
4.38%
1Y
11.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOCT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GJUN vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GJUN vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GJUN
GJUN Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
GJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
GJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
GJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

HOCT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GJUN vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GJUNHOCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.25

GJUN vs. HOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GJUNHOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

Drawdowns

GJUN vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GJUN drawdown since its inception was -10.97%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GJUN and HOCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GJUNHOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.97%

0.00%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

0.00%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

Volatility

GJUN vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GJUNHOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.91%

0.00%

+4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.89%

0.00%

+7.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.89%

0.00%

+7.89%

GJUN vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GJUN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

GJUN vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither GJUN nor HOCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, HOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GJUN.

GJUN and HOCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for GJUN and 0.79% for HOCT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GJUN and HOCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer