GIYIX vs. FULBX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GIYIX (Guggenheim Ultra Short Duration Fund) and FULBX (Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, GIYIX returned 3.83%/yr vs 3.12%/yr for FULBX. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GIYIX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for FULBX.

Performance

GIYIX vs. FULBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Ultra Short Duration Fund (GIYIX) and Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund (FULBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIYIX achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly higher than FULBX's 1.40% return.

GIYIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 6.04%
• 5Y*: 3.83%
• 10Y*: —

FULBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: 4.93%
• 3Y*: 5.10%
• 5Y*: 3.12%
• 10Y*: 2.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIYIX vs. FULBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GIYIX Guggenheim Ultra Short Duration Fund	1.63%	5.20%	7.04%	6.81%	-1.19%	0.17%	1.78%	2.45%	0.16%
FULBX Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund	1.40%	5.50%	5.35%	5.15%	-1.31%	0.02%	2.29%	3.32%	-0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GIYIX and FULBX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2018	0.44

The correlation between GIYIX and FULBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.48 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GIYIX vs. FULBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIYIX

GIYIX Risk / Return Rank: 98
GIYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
GIYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
GIYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
GIYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
GIYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

FULBX

FULBX Risk / Return Rank: 97
FULBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FULBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FULBX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FULBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FULBX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIYIX vs. FULBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Ultra Short Duration Fund (GIYIX) and Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund (FULBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GIYIX	FULBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.29	3.13	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	9.86	8.67	+1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.09	2.67	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.87	9.25	+2.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	57.72	42.84	+14.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GIYIX vs. FULBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIYIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is comparable to the FULBX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIYIX and FULBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GIYIX	FULBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.29	3.13	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.54	2.28	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.96	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.22	1.10	+1.12

Drawdowns

GIYIX vs. FULBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIYIX drawdown since its inception was -3.50%, smaller than the maximum FULBX drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIYIX and FULBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIYIX	FULBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.50%	-5.43%	+1.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.40%	-0.54%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.40%	-0.54%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-3.15%	-2.60%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-4.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.35%	-0.80%	+0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.08%	0.12%	-0.04%

Volatility

GIYIX vs. FULBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Ultra Short Duration Fund (GIYIX) is 0.45%, while Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund (FULBX) has a volatility of 0.48%. This indicates that GIYIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FULBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIYIX	FULBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.45%	0.48%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.00%	1.15%	-0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.43%	1.58%	-0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.52%	1.37%	+0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.43%	1.26%	+0.17%

GIYIX vs. FULBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIYIX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than FULBX's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

GIYIX vs. FULBX - Dividend Comparison

GIYIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, less than FULBX's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FULBX Federated Hermes Ultra Short Bond Fund	4.60%	4.79%	3.99%	2.67%	1.00%	0.56%	1.49%	2.16%	1.90%	1.25%	0.84%	0.64%
GIYIX Guggenheim Ultra Short Duration Fund	4.36%	4.35%	5.15%	4.38%	1.67%	0.78%	1.45%	2.52%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIYIX and FULBX in my portfolio?

GIYIX and FULBX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GIYIX or FULBX?

FULBX has higher volatility (0.48%) compared to GIYIX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIYIX dropped -3.50% vs FULBX's -5.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GIYIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 3.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.