GINDX vs. SVPFX
GINDX (Gotham Index Plus Fund) and SVPFX (Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GINDX returned 15.54%/yr vs 2.10%/yr for SVPFX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GINDX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for SVPFX.
Performance
GINDX vs. SVPFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GINDX achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly higher than SVPFX's 1.49% return.
GINDX
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 27.91%
- 3Y*
- 23.84%
- 5Y*
- 15.54%
- 10Y*
- 15.81%
SVPFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.10%
- 10Y*
- —
GINDX vs. SVPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GINDX Gotham Index Plus Fund | 7.57% | 22.25% | 25.96% | 26.40% | -11.61% | 17.43% |
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund | 1.49% | 4.19% | 3.82% | 5.30% | -4.37% | 0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between GINDX and SVPFX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GINDX vs. SVPFX — Risk / Return Rank
GINDX
SVPFX
GINDX vs. SVPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gotham Index Plus Fund (GINDX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GINDX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.53 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 3.97 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.89 | 13.46 | -0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GINDX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.48 | 2.35 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.38 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.39 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
GINDX vs. SVPFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GINDX drawdown since its inception was -33.70%, which is greater than SVPFX's maximum drawdown of -6.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GINDX and SVPFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GINDX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.70% | -6.37% | -27.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.06% | -1.33% | -7.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | -5.32% | -13.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.77% | -6.37% | -13.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -0.20% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.01% | -1.93% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 0.43% | +1.82% |
Volatility
GINDX vs. SVPFX - Volatility Comparison
Gotham Index Plus Fund (GINDX) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) at 0.67%. This indicates that GINDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GINDX | SVPFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 0.67% | +2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.71% | 1.47% | +7.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 2.26% | +9.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 5.60% | +11.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 5.51% | +12.67% |
GINDX vs. SVPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GINDX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SVPFX's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
GINDX vs. SVPFX - Dividend Comparison
GINDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than SVPFX's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GINDX Gotham Index Plus Fund | 3.04% | 3.27% | 2.97% | 4.02% | 1.81% | 5.38% | 1.07% | 1.38% | 2.10% | 0.37% | 0.48% |
SVPFX Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund | 2.47% | 1.83% | 4.37% | 4.29% | 0.76% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GINDX and SVPFX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GINDX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to SVPFX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GINDX dropped -33.70% vs SVPFX's -6.37%.
GINDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GINDX and SVPFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer