GIMFX vs. RMGSX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

GIMFX (GMO Implementation Fund) and RMGSX (Russell Investments Multi-Asset Growth Strategy Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, GIMFX returned 9.58%/yr vs 5.97%/yr for RMGSX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GIMFX charges 0.02%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for RMGSX.

Performance

GIMFX vs. RMGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX) and Russell Investments Multi-Asset Growth Strategy Fund (RMGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIMFX achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly higher than RMGSX's 6.26% return.

GIMFX

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: -0.58%
• YTD: 11.23%
• 6M: 11.23%
• 1Y: 27.55%
• 3Y*: 16.38%
• 5Y*: 9.58%
• 10Y*: 7.21%

RMGSX

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -0.79%
• YTD: 6.26%
• 6M: 5.99%
• 1Y: 15.33%
• 3Y*: 13.24%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIMFX vs. RMGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GIMFX GMO Implementation Fund	11.23%	25.37%	2.67%	14.75%	-1.24%	4.05%	-7.25%	13.24%	-5.58%	8.22%
RMGSX Russell Investments Multi-Asset Growth Strategy Fund	6.26%	17.38%	8.76%	15.26%	-14.73%	7.88%	3.14%	9.22%	-4.92%	5.43%

Correlation

The correlation between GIMFX and RMGSX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017	0.70

The correlation between GIMFX and RMGSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (5 years) to 0.81 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GIMFX vs. RMGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIMFX

GIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 94
GIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
GIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
GIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
GIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
GIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

RMGSX

RMGSX Risk / Return Rank: 65
RMGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RMGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
RMGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
RMGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
RMGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIMFX vs. RMGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX) and Russell Investments Multi-Asset Growth Strategy Fund (RMGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GIMFX	RMGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.44	2.07	+1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.81	2.90	+1.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.68	1.39	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.36	2.43	+1.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.56	10.42	+6.14

GIMFX vs. RMGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIMFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.44, which is higher than the RMGSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIMFX and RMGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GIMFX vs. RMGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIMFX drawdown since its inception was -25.87%, roughly equal to the maximum RMGSX drawdown of -24.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIMFX and RMGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIMFX	RMGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.87%	-24.93%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.53%	-6.73%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.02%	-8.85%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.20%	-23.20%	+10.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.57%	-1.80%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.28%	-4.16%	-0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	1.56%	+0.16%

Volatility

GIMFX vs. RMGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX) is 2.89%, while Russell Investments Multi-Asset Growth Strategy Fund (RMGSX) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that GIMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIMFX	RMGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.89%	3.09%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.68%	6.55%	+0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.29%	7.91%	+0.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.64%	10.36%	-1.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.95%	10.28%	-1.33%

GIMFX vs. RMGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIMFX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than RMGSX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

GIMFX vs. RMGSX - Dividend Comparison

GIMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than RMGSX's 4.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GIMFX GMO Implementation Fund	3.84%	4.28%	3.39%	5.93%	3.59%	3.28%	2.25%	3.99%	4.59%	2.95%	1.98%
RMGSX Russell Investments Multi-Asset Growth Strategy Fund	4.03%	4.32%	3.60%	3.48%	0.76%	6.27%	0.80%	3.35%	2.46%	1.33%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIMFX and RMGSX in my portfolio?

GIMFX and RMGSX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GIMFX or RMGSX?

RMGSX has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to GIMFX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIMFX dropped -25.87% vs RMGSX's -24.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GIMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.