PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GILI.L vs. TP05.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GILI.L vs. TP05.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Core UK Government Inflation-Linked UCITS ETF - Dist (GILI.L) and iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GILI.L achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly higher than TP05.L's -0.38% return.


GILI.L

1D
0.01%
1M
0.91%
YTD
-0.12%
6M
-1.39%
1Y
2.44%
3Y*
-1.24%
5Y*
-8.32%
10Y*
-1.42%

TP05.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
-0.27%
3Y*
-3.94%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GILI.L vs. TP05.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GILI.L
Lyxor Core UK Government Inflation-Linked UCITS ETF - Dist
-0.12%1.23%-9.36%0.22%-33.81%3.90%10.51%6.04%-0.74%-2.41%
TP05.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-0.38%-6.85%-0.44%-6.21%8.40%6.35%-1.65%-1.59%3.26%-4.52%

Correlation

The correlation between GILI.L and TP05.L is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017

0.13

The correlation between GILI.L and TP05.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GILI.L vs. TP05.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GILI.L
GILI.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
GILI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GILI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

TP05.L
TP05.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TP05.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TP05.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TP05.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TP05.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TP05.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GILI.L vs. TP05.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core UK Government Inflation-Linked UCITS ETF - Dist (GILI.L) and iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GILI.LTP05.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.00

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

-0.03

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.86

-0.07

+0.92

GILI.L vs. TP05.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GILI.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is higher than the TP05.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GILI.L and TP05.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GILI.LTP05.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

-0.03

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.44

0.02

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

-0.06

+0.21

Drawdowns

GILI.L vs. TP05.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GILI.L drawdown since its inception was -49.28%, which is greater than TP05.L's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILI.L and TP05.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GILI.LTP05.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.28%

-23.61%

-25.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.25%

-7.76%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.79%

-15.39%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.28%

-23.61%

-25.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.05%

-22.31%

-20.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.42%

-10.24%

-5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

3.88%

-1.04%

Volatility

GILI.L vs. TP05.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Core UK Government Inflation-Linked UCITS ETF - Dist (GILI.L) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L) at 3.02%. This indicates that GILI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TP05.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GILI.LTP05.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

3.02%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.56%

5.23%

+1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.67%

7.68%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.72%

8.80%

+9.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.44%

8.99%

+7.45%

GILI.L vs. TP05.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GILI.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TP05.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GILI.L vs. TP05.L - Dividend Comparison

GILI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than TP05.L's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GILI.L
Lyxor Core UK Government Inflation-Linked UCITS ETF - Dist
0.01%0.01%0.01%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%
TP05.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.06%0.06%0.07%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GILI.L and TP05.L have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GILI.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GILI.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for TP05.L.

GILI.L tracks FTSE Actuaries UK Index-Linked Gilts All Stocks, while TP05.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Lyxor and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GILI.L and 0.10% for TP05.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GILI.L and TP05.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer