GILI.L vs. TIPG.L
GILI.L (Lyxor Core UK Government Inflation-Linked UCITS ETF - Dist) and TIPG.L (Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - GILI.L tracks the FTSE Actuaries UK Index-Linked Gilts All Stocks while TIPG.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GILI.L returned -8.32%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for TIPG.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GILI.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for TIPG.L.
Performance
GILI.L vs. TIPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GILI.L achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly lower than TIPG.L's 1.46% return.
GILI.L
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- -1.39%
- 1Y
- 2.44%
- 3Y*
- -1.24%
- 5Y*
- -8.32%
- 10Y*
- -1.42%
TIPG.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 0.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- —
GILI.L vs. TIPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILI.L Lyxor Core UK Government Inflation-Linked UCITS ETF - Dist | -0.12% | 1.23% | -9.36% | 0.22% | -33.81% | 3.90% | 10.51% | 6.04% | -0.74% | 1.90% |
TIPG.L Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 1.46% | -1.51% | 2.83% | -2.90% | -2.52% | 6.54% | 6.58% | 4.69% | 2.93% | -6.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between GILI.L and TIPG.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016 | 0.28 |
The correlation between GILI.L and TIPG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GILI.L vs. TIPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
GILI.L
TIPG.L
GILI.L vs. TIPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core UK Government Inflation-Linked UCITS ETF - Dist (GILI.L) and Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GILI.L | TIPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.13 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 0.75 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.86 | 1.67 | -0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GILI.L | TIPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 0.74 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 | 0.14 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.11 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
GILI.L vs. TIPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILI.L drawdown since its inception was -49.28%, which is greater than TIPG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILI.L and TIPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GILI.L | TIPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.28% | -15.73% | -33.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.25% | -6.27% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.79% | -8.00% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.28% | -15.73% | -33.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.05% | -10.38% | -32.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.42% | -7.90% | -7.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 2.82% | +0.02% |
Volatility
GILI.L vs. TIPG.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor Core UK Government Inflation-Linked UCITS ETF - Dist (GILI.L) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L) at 1.82%. This indicates that GILI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GILI.L | TIPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 1.82% | +1.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.56% | 4.67% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.67% | 6.38% | +2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 8.73% | +9.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.44% | 10.30% | +6.14% |
GILI.L vs. TIPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GILI.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TIPG.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GILI.L vs. TIPG.L - Dividend Comparison
GILI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, which matches TIPG.L's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILI.L Lyxor Core UK Government Inflation-Linked UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
TIPG.L Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GILI.L and TIPG.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GILI.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GILI.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for TIPG.L.
GILI.L tracks FTSE Actuaries UK Index-Linked Gilts All Stocks, while TIPG.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Lyxor and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for GILI.L and 0.09% for TIPG.L.
Find the right allocation for GILI.L and TIPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer