GILG.L vs. IDTP.L
GILG.L (iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and IDTP.L (iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds from iShares - GILG.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR Hdg GBP while IDTP.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GILG.L returned -1.48%/yr vs 2.05%/yr for IDTP.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GILG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for IDTP.L.
Performance
GILG.L vs. IDTP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GILG.L is traded in GBP, while IDTP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDTP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GILG.L having a 1.51% return and IDTP.L slightly lower at 1.50%.
GILG.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 4.17%
- 3Y*
- 2.43%
- 5Y*
- -1.48%
- 10Y*
- —
IDTP.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 5.81%
- 3Y*
- 1.21%
- 5Y*
- 2.05%
- 10Y*
- 3.38%
GILG.L vs. IDTP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILG.L iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 1.51% | 4.23% | -0.86% | 3.12% | -18.45% | 5.19% | 2.37% |
IDTP.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.50% | -0.68% | 3.94% | -1.47% | -2.38% | 7.17% | -2.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between GILG.L and IDTP.L is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2020 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GILG.L and IDTP.L has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GILG.L vs. IDTP.L — Risk / Return Rank
GILG.L
IDTP.L
GILG.L vs. IDTP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (GILG.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GILG.L | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.15 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 0.99 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.72 | 2.62 | +2.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GILG.L | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | 0.22 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.50 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
GILG.L vs. IDTP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GILG.L drawdown since its inception was -24.23%, which is greater than IDTP.L's maximum drawdown of -17.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GILG.L and IDTP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GILG.L | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.23% | -17.38% | -6.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.43% | -5.83% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.52% | -8.23% | +2.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.23% | -16.60% | -7.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.44% | -8.81% | -4.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.12% | -6.75% | -6.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 2.22% | -1.34% |
Volatility
GILG.L vs. IDTP.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (GILG.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IDTP.L) have volatilities of 1.48% and 1.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GILG.L | IDTP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 1.51% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.40% | 5.29% | -1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.84% | 6.76% | -1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.79% | 9.12% | -1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.54% | 10.72% | -3.18% |
GILG.L vs. IDTP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GILG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IDTP.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GILG.L vs. IDTP.L - Dividend Comparison
GILG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while IDTP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILG.L iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 0.98% | 0.96% | 0.87% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.50% |
IDTP.L iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GILG.L and IDTP.L have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDTP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDTP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GILG.L.
GILG.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR Hdg GBP, while IDTP.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GILG.L and 0.12% for IDTP.L.
Find the right allocation for GILG.L and IDTP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer