PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIL5.L vs. HYUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIL5.L vs. HYUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor UK Government Bond 0-5Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GIL5.L) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HYUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GIL5.L is traded in GBP, while HYUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HYUS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIL5.L achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than HYUS.L's 1.63% return.


GIL5.L

1D
0.13%
1M
0.67%
YTD
0.44%
6M
0.54%
1Y
3.07%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
1.25%
10Y*

HYUS.L

1D
-0.00%
1M
1.43%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.47%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
6.14%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIL5.L vs. HYUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GIL5.L
Lyxor UK Government Bond 0-5Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.44%5.12%2.49%4.05%-2.93%
HYUS.L
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.63%0.89%10.17%7.21%1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GIL5.L and HYUS.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2022

0.11

The correlation between GIL5.L and HYUS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIL5.L vs. HYUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIL5.L
GIL5.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GIL5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIL5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIL5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GIL5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIL5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

HYUS.L
HYUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HYUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
HYUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIL5.L vs. HYUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UK Government Bond 0-5Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GIL5.L) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HYUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIL5.LHYUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.22

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

2.12

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.31

6.42

-1.11

GIL5.L vs. HYUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIL5.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the HYUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIL5.L and HYUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIL5.LHYUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

1.21

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.57

-0.20

Drawdowns

GIL5.L vs. HYUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIL5.L drawdown since its inception was -9.42%, smaller than the maximum HYUS.L drawdown of -11.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIL5.L and HYUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIL5.LHYUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.42%

-11.15%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.91%

-3.73%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.91%

-10.40%

+8.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-1.51%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-4.11%

+2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

1.24%

-0.66%

Volatility

GIL5.L vs. HYUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor UK Government Bond 0-5Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (GIL5.L) is 0.56%, while iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (HYUS.L) has a volatility of 2.04%. This indicates that GIL5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIL5.LHYUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

2.04%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.72%

5.01%

-3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03%

6.55%

-4.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.61%

9.11%

-6.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.13%

9.11%

-6.98%

GIL5.L vs. HYUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIL5.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than HYUS.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GIL5.L vs. HYUS.L - Dividend Comparison

GIL5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than HYUS.L's 9.21% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GIL5.L
Lyxor UK Government Bond 0-5Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
2.33%2.34%1.94%1.36%1.39%1.60%2.26%2.70%2.92%3.17%1.56%
HYUS.L
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
9.21%7.38%7.54%6.30%1.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIL5.L and HYUS.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GIL5.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GIL5.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HYUS.L.

GIL5.L is categorized as European Government Bonds, while HYUS.L is High Yield Bonds. GIL5.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP, while HYUS.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for GIL5.L and 0.20% for HYUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIL5.L and HYUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer