GIJAX vs. GOF
GIJAX (Guggenheim Municipal Income Fund) and GOF (Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund) are both mutual funds - GIJAX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Guggenheim, while GOF is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Guggenheim. Over the past 10 years, GIJAX returned 1.39%/yr vs 7.80%/yr for GOF. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GIJAX charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for GOF.
Performance
GIJAX vs. GOF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIJAX achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than GOF's -8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, GIJAX has underperformed GOF with an annualized return of 1.39%, while GOF has yielded a comparatively higher 7.80% annualized return.
GIJAX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 8.01%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- -0.40%
- 10Y*
- 1.39%
GOF
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- -8.44%
- 6M
- -3.65%
- 1Y
- -12.39%
- 3Y*
- 3.32%
- 5Y*
- 0.33%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
GIJAX vs. GOF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIJAX Guggenheim Municipal Income Fund | 1.77% | 5.11% | 2.49% | 3.39% | -13.84% | 1.52% | 5.01% | 6.84% | 0.84% | 5.76% |
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | -8.44% | -1.92% | 38.04% | -3.04% | -5.78% | 4.90% | 21.51% | 10.51% | -5.95% | 22.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIJAX and GOF is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIJAX vs. GOF — Risk / Return Rank
GIJAX
GOF
GIJAX vs. GOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Municipal Income Fund (GIJAX) and Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIJAX | GOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 0.87 | +0.87 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | -0.54 | +3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.29 | -0.97 | +13.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIJAX vs. GOF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIJAX drawdown since its inception was -58.74%, which is greater than GOF's maximum drawdown of -54.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIJAX and GOF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIJAX | GOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.74% | -54.66% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.65% | -23.24% | +20.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.29% | -28.56% | +21.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.73% | -32.41% | +12.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.73% | -38.50% | +18.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.57% | -18.44% | +14.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.89% | -7.08% | -9.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 12.79% | -12.14% |
Volatility
GIJAX vs. GOF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guggenheim Municipal Income Fund (GIJAX) is 0.82%, while Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that GIJAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIJAX | GOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.82% | 3.19% | -2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.16% | 11.05% | -8.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76% | 18.03% | -15.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.55% | 18.18% | -13.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.44% | 19.53% | -15.09% |
GIJAX vs. GOF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIJAX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than GOF's 1.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIJAX vs. GOF - Dividend Comparison
GIJAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than GOF's 20.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIJAX Guggenheim Municipal Income Fund | 3.26% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 1.90% | 2.79% | 1.82% | 1.84% | 2.21% | 2.73% | 2.23% | 2.05% | 2.27% |
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | 20.35% | 16.97% | 14.32% | 17.07% | 14.36% | 11.93% | 11.26% | 12.08% | 11.96% | 10.13% | 11.13% | 12.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GIJAX and GOF have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOF has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to GIJAX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIJAX dropped -58.74% vs GOF's -54.66%.
GIJAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GIJAX and GOF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer