PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIIAX vs. GBIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIIAX vs. GBIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide International Index Fund (GIIAX) and Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIIAX achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly higher than GBIAX's 0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, GIIAX has outperformed GBIAX with an annualized return of 9.31%, while GBIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.85% annualized return.


GIIAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
7.86%
6M
7.44%
1Y
20.14%
3Y*
15.92%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
9.31%

GBIAX

1D
0.42%
1M
0.81%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.51%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
3.44%
5Y*
-0.57%
10Y*
0.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIIAX vs. GBIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIIAX
Nationwide International Index Fund
7.86%31.11%3.05%16.88%-14.43%10.67%7.26%21.56%-14.10%24.81%
GBIAX
Nationwide Bond Index Fund
0.45%6.54%0.44%5.03%-14.06%-2.38%6.60%8.08%-0.74%2.89%

Correlation

The correlation between GIIAX and GBIAX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2000

-0.09

The correlation between GIIAX and GBIAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIIAX vs. GBIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIIAX
GIIAX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GIIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GIIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

GBIAX
GBIAX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
GBIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
GBIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIIAX vs. GBIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide International Index Fund (GIIAX) and Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GIIAXGBIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.17

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

1.29

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.37

3.53

+2.84

GIIAX vs. GBIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the GBIAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIIAX and GBIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GIIAX vs. GBIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIIAX drawdown since its inception was -61.28%, which is greater than GBIAX's maximum drawdown of -20.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIIAX and GBIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIIAXGBIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.28%

-20.26%

-41.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.21%

-3.00%

-8.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.63%

-6.30%

-7.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.61%

-19.07%

-10.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.23%

-20.26%

-13.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-5.98%

+3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.03%

-3.05%

-12.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

1.09%

+1.98%

Volatility

GIIAX vs. GBIAX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide International Index Fund (GIIAX) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Nationwide Bond Index Fund (GBIAX) at 1.31%. This indicates that GIIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIIAXGBIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

1.31%

+4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.88%

2.91%

+9.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

3.92%

+11.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.82%

6.02%

+9.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

4.96%

+11.18%

GIIAX vs. GBIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIIAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than GBIAX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIIAX vs. GBIAX - Dividend Comparison

GIIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.80%, more than GBIAX's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBIAX
Nationwide Bond Index Fund
3.28%3.18%3.07%2.57%1.59%3.02%1.79%2.27%2.29%1.93%2.15%2.43%
GIIAX
Nationwide International Index Fund
6.80%7.14%3.84%2.99%1.90%3.69%1.58%4.20%6.17%6.21%2.87%3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


GIIAX and GBIAX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GIIAX has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to GBIAX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GIIAX dropped -61.28% vs GBIAX's -20.26%.

GIIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIIAX and GBIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer