GIGB.L vs. XDEV.L
GIGB.L (VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF) and XDEV.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both Global Equities funds - GIGB.L tracks the VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF while XDEV.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GIGB.L returned 13.45%/yr vs 17.13%/yr for XDEV.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GIGB.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEV.L.
Performance
GIGB.L vs. XDEV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GIGB.L is traded in GBP, while XDEV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEV.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIGB.L achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than XDEV.L's 29.58% return.
GIGB.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -13.91%
- 6M
- -11.20%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 52.68%
- 3Y*
- 20.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.45%
- 10Y*
- —
XDEV.L
- 1D
- -2.22%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- 6M
- 25.56%
- YTD
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- 56.03%
- 3Y*
- 25.49%
- 5Y*
- 17.13%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
GIGB.L vs. XDEV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIGB.L VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF | 0.48% | 77.74% | -7.37% | -1.37% | 15.87% | 8.64% | 27.01% | 21.34% | -33.33% |
XDEV.L Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 29.58% | 30.51% | 6.79% | 13.25% | 1.01% | 21.67% | -6.88% | 14.56% | -5.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIGB.L and XDEV.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2018 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIGB.L vs. XDEV.L — Risk / Return Rank
GIGB.L
XDEV.L
GIGB.L vs. XDEV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GIGB.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIGB.L | XDEV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.68 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 8.06 | -6.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 26.50 | -21.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIGB.L vs. XDEV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIGB.L drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, roughly equal to the maximum XDEV.L drawdown of -45.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGB.L and XDEV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIGB.L | XDEV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.07% | -45.89% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.52% | -6.92% | -19.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.52% | -19.90% | -6.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.29% | -19.90% | -9.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.02% | -5.91% | -18.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.82% | -15.27% | +0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.76% | 2.11% | +7.65% |
Volatility
GIGB.L vs. XDEV.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GIGB.L) has a higher volatility of 10.51% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) at 6.07%. This indicates that GIGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIGB.L | XDEV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.51% | 6.07% | +4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.35% | 13.08% | +15.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.84% | 15.01% | +18.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.68% | 19.12% | +10.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.36% | 21.02% | +8.34% |
GIGB.L vs. XDEV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIGB.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEV.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIGB.L vs. XDEV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GIGB.L nor XDEV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIGB.L and XDEV.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEV.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEV.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GIGB.L.
GIGB.L tracks VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF, while XDEV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GIGB.L and 0.25% for XDEV.L.
Find the right allocation for GIGB.L and XDEV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer