GIGB.L vs. VPAC.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

GIGB.L (VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF) and VPAC.L (Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD) are both Global Equities funds - GIGB.L tracks the VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF while VPAC.L tracks the Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GIGB.L returned 13.45%/yr vs 4.29%/yr for VPAC.L. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

GIGB.L vs. VPAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GIGB.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

GIGB.L is traded in GBP, while VPAC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VPAC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIGB.L achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than VPAC.L's 3.01% return.

GIGB.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -13.91%
• 6M: -11.20%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 1Y: 52.68%
• 3Y*: 20.60%
• 5Y*: 13.45%
• 10Y*: —

VPAC.L

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 0.51%
• 6M: 2.59%
• YTD: 3.01%
• 1Y: 5.62%
• 3Y*: 7.72%
• 5Y*: 4.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIGB.L vs. VPAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GIGB.L VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF	0.48%	77.74%	-7.37%	-1.37%	15.87%	8.64%	27.01%	21.34%	2.66%
VPAC.L Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD	3.01%	-1.24%	12.77%	3.80%	1.04%	4.62%	1.73%	12.68%	-2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between GIGB.L and VPAC.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2018	0.02

The correlation between GIGB.L and VPAC.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (3 years) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GIGB.L vs. VPAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIGB.L

GIGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 48
GIGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
GIGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
GIGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 48
GIGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
GIGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 41

VPAC.L

VPAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 65
VPAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
VPAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
VPAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VPAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
VPAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIGB.L vs. VPAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GIGB.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GIGB.L	VPAC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	0.93	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	1.38	+0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.17	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	1.27	+0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.30	3.30	+1.99

GIGB.L vs. VPAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the VPAC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIGB.L and VPAC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GIGB.L vs. VPAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIGB.L drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, which is greater than VPAC.L's maximum drawdown of -26.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGB.L and VPAC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIGB.L	VPAC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.07%	-26.87%	-18.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.52%	-4.94%	-21.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.52%	-9.34%	-17.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.29%	-15.98%	-13.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.02%	-1.48%	-22.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.82%	-4.54%	-10.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.76%	1.90%	+7.86%

Volatility

GIGB.L vs. VPAC.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GIGB.L) has a higher volatility of 10.51% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (VPAC.L) at 1.91%. This indicates that GIGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GIGB.L	VPAC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.51%	1.91%	+8.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.35%	5.14%	+23.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.84%	6.72%	+27.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.68%	8.70%	+20.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.36%	12.35%	+17.01%

GIGB.L vs. VPAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GIGB.L and VPAC.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

GIGB.L vs. VPAC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GIGB.L nor VPAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIGB.L and VPAC.L in my portfolio?

GIGB.L and VPAC.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GIGB.L or VPAC.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GIGB.L or VPAC.L?

GIGB.L and VPAC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

What is the main difference between GIGB.L and VPAC.L?

GIGB.L tracks VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF, while VPAC.L tracks Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco.