GIGB.L vs. KSTR.L
GIGB.L (VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF) and KSTR.L (KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - GIGB.L tracks the VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF while KSTR.L tracks the KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GIGB.L returned 13.45%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for KSTR.L. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GIGB.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for KSTR.L.
Performance
GIGB.L vs. KSTR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GIGB.L is traded in GBP, while KSTR.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the KSTR.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GIGB.L achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than KSTR.L's 47.78% return.
GIGB.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -13.91%
- 6M
- -11.20%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 52.68%
- 3Y*
- 20.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.45%
- 10Y*
- —
KSTR.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 30.93%
- YTD
- 47.78%
- 1Y
- 100.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.82%
- 5Y*
- 1.08%
- 10Y*
- —
GIGB.L vs. KSTR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIGB.L VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF | 0.48% | 77.74% | -7.37% | -1.37% | 15.87% | -3.45% |
KSTR.L KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF | 47.78% | 32.59% | 7.07% | -22.86% | -30.81% | 7.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GIGB.L and KSTR.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GIGB.L vs. KSTR.L — Risk / Return Rank
GIGB.L
KSTR.L
GIGB.L vs. KSTR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GIGB.L) and KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF (KSTR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GIGB.L | KSTR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.42 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 5.51 | -3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 13.88 | -8.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GIGB.L vs. KSTR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GIGB.L drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, smaller than the maximum KSTR.L drawdown of -65.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGB.L and KSTR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GIGB.L | KSTR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.07% | -65.22% | +20.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.52% | -18.17% | -8.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.52% | -38.63% | +12.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.29% | -65.22% | +35.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.02% | -16.50% | -7.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.82% | -35.63% | +20.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.76% | 7.22% | +2.54% |
Volatility
GIGB.L vs. KSTR.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GIGB.L) is 10.51%, while KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF (KSTR.L) has a volatility of 18.96%. This indicates that GIGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KSTR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GIGB.L | KSTR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.51% | 18.96% | -8.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.35% | 32.99% | -4.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.84% | 39.98% | -6.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.68% | 33.76% | -4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.36% | 33.70% | -4.34% |
GIGB.L vs. KSTR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GIGB.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KSTR.L's 0.82% expense ratio.
Dividends
GIGB.L vs. KSTR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GIGB.L nor KSTR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GIGB.L and KSTR.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GIGB.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GIGB.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for KSTR.L.
GIGB.L tracks VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF, while KSTR.L tracks KraneShares ICBCCS SSE Star Market 50 Index UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GIGB.L and 0.82% for KSTR.L.
Find the right allocation for GIGB.L and KSTR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer