PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GIGB.L vs. HKOD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GIGB.L vs. HKOD.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

GIGB.L (VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF) and HKOD.L (HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - GIGB.L tracks the VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF while HKOD.L tracks the HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GIGB.L returned 13.45%/yr vs 15.49%/yr for HKOD.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

GIGB.L vs. HKOD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GIGB.L) and HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GIGB.L is traded in GBP, while HKOD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HKOD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GIGB.L achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than HKOD.L's 72.55% return.

GIGB.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-13.91%
6M
-11.20%
YTD
0.48%
1Y
52.68%
3Y*
20.60%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
—

HKOD.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-19.96%
6M
54.32%
YTD
72.55%
1Y
140.31%
3Y*
37.06%
5Y*
15.49%
10Y*
14.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIGB.L vs. HKOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GIGB.L
VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF		0.48%77.74%-7.37%-1.37%15.87%8.64%27.01%21.34%-33.33%
HKOD.L
HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF		72.55%85.32%-21.55%13.96%-19.93%-7.62%40.82%6.43%-11.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GIGB.L and HKOD.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2018

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF

HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

GIGB.L vs. HKOD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GIGB.L
GIGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GIGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GIGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
HKOD.L
HKOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HKOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HKOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIGB.L vs. HKOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GIGB.L) and HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

GIGB.LHKOD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.53
3.20

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.03
3.31

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.47

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

5.73

-3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.30

18.17

-12.87

GIGB.L vs. HKOD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GIGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the HKOD.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIGB.L and HKOD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GIGB.L vs. HKOD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIGB.L drawdown since its inception was -45.07%, roughly equal to the maximum HKOD.L drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIGB.L and HKOD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GIGB.LHKOD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.07%

-44.38%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.52%

-24.53%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.52%

-29.12%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.29%

-39.67%

+10.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-44.38%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.02%

-24.53%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.82%

-15.51%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.76%

7.76%

+2.00%

Volatility

GIGB.L vs. HKOD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GIGB.L) is 10.51%, while HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L) has a volatility of 20.24%. This indicates that GIGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HKOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GIGB.LHKOD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.51%

20.24%

-9.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.35%

40.06%

-11.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.84%

43.91%

-10.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.68%

28.07%

+1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.36%

25.99%

+3.37%

GIGB.L vs. HKOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GIGB.L and HKOD.L have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

GIGB.L vs. HKOD.L - Dividend Comparison

GIGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HKOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GIGB.L
VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HKOD.L
HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF		0.43%0.68%1.54%1.08%0.72%0.61%0.02%0.29%0.56%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

GIGB.L and HKOD.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GIGB.L and HKOD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

GIGB.L tracks VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF, while HKOD.L tracks HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and HSBC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIGB.L and HKOD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer