GIF vs. LQTI

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

GIF (REX Growth & Income Universe ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GIF charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

GIF vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Growth & Income Universe ETF (GIF) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GIF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 12,389.21%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 0.23%
• 6M: 0.65%
• YTD: 0.65%
• 1Y: 4.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GIF vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GIF REX Growth & Income Universe ETF	12,941.67%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between GIF and LQTI is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026	0.40

Return for Risk

GIF vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GIF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 25
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 21
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GIF vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Growth & Income Universe ETF (GIF) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GIF	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.80	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.16	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.14	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.20	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.54	—

Drawdowns

GIF vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GIF drawdown since its inception was -12.61%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIF and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GIF	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.61%	-3.41%	-9.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.95%	+0.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-0.90%	-3.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GIF	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.61%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23,333.19%	5.15%	+23,328.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23,333.19%	5.93%	+23,327.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23,333.19%	5.93%	+23,327.26%

GIF vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIF has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

GIF vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

GIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.48%, more than LQTI's 9.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GIF REX Growth & Income Universe ETF	109.48%	0.00%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.12%	7.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GIF and LQTI in my portfolio?

GIF and LQTI have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GIF or LQTI?

On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GIF or LQTI?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GIF or LQTI?

GIF has the higher dividend yield at 109.48%, compared with 9.12% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between GIF and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: REX and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GIF and 0.65% for LQTI.