PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GIF vs. LQTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GIF vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Growth & Income Universe ETF (GIF) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GIF

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

LQTI

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.24%
6M
-1.58%
YTD
-1.60%
1Y
1.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.40M$2.20M$1.68M

GIF vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GIF and LQTI is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GIF vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GIF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


LQTI
LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GIF vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Growth & Income Universe ETF (GIF) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GIFLQTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.35

GIF vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GIF vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIFLQTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

Volatility

GIF vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIFLQTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.90%

GIF vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GIF has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

GIF vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

GIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 109.48%, more than LQTI's 9.33% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GIF and LQTI have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GIF.

GIF has the higher dividend yield at 109.48%, compared with 8.54% for LQTI.

They also come from different issuers: REX and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GIF and 0.65% for LQTI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GIF and LQTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer